PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDCAX vs. BLNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDCAX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund (NDCAX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDCAX achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 12.91% return.


NDCAX

1D
0.49%
1M
1.07%
YTD
3.29%
6M
3.40%
1Y
9.19%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
2.48%
10Y*
3.49%

BLNDX

1D
0.48%
1M
-3.47%
YTD
12.91%
6M
12.69%
1Y
30.93%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDCAX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NDCAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund
3.29%8.40%4.15%8.61%-12.52%3.71%8.22%0.00%
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
12.91%4.12%13.11%5.79%3.71%20.16%16.30%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NDCAX and BLNDX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.40

The correlation between NDCAX and BLNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (5 years) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDCAX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDCAX
NDCAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NDCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NDCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNDX
BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDCAX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund (NDCAX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDCAXBLNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

5.89

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.51

18.90

-8.39

NDCAX vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDCAX and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDCAX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDCAX drawdown since its inception was -17.56%, roughly equal to the maximum BLNDX drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDCAX and BLNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDCAXBLNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.56%

-17.69%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-5.19%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.28%

-17.69%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.56%

-17.69%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-4.73%

+4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-3.19%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.61%

-0.73%

Volatility

NDCAX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund (NDCAX) is 1.79%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that NDCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDCAXBLNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

3.59%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.91%

9.91%

-6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50%

12.74%

-8.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

11.71%

-5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

11.77%

-6.79%

NDCAX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDCAX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDCAX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

NDCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than BLNDX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLNDX
Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional
0.65%0.73%5.74%3.71%2.67%6.11%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NDCAX
Nationwide Investor Destinations Conservative Fund
3.06%3.60%5.42%3.42%2.06%3.02%2.98%1.63%5.35%2.27%2.91%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDCAX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLNDX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to NDCAX (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDCAX dropped -17.56% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDCAX and BLNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer