PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCIQ vs. EZET
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NCIQ vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NCIQ vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NCIQ
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF
-23.64%-10.21%
EZET
Franklin Ethereum ETF
-27.89%8.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCIQ achieves a -23.64% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -27.89% return.


NCIQ

1D
0.75%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-23.64%
6M
-45.48%
1Y
-19.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZET

1D
2.14%
1M
5.11%
YTD
-27.89%
6M
-50.71%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NCIQ vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCIQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NCIQ vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCIQ
NCIQ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NCIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NCIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

EZET
EZET Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCIQ vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCIQEZETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

0.16

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.27

0.79

-1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.09

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

0.28

-0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.67

0.56

-1.23

NCIQ vs. EZET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the EZET Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCIQ and EZET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCIQEZETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

0.16

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.58

-0.33

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between NCIQ and EZET is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NCIQ vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

Neither NCIQ nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NCIQ vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIQ and EZET.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NCIQEZETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.90%

-64.05%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.90%

-61.68%

+8.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.93%

-55.80%

+6.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.46%

-30.49%

+12.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.05%

30.61%

-5.56%

Volatility

NCIQ vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) is 13.66%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 19.05%. This indicates that NCIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NCIQEZETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.66%

19.05%

-5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.15%

53.59%

-13.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.10%

75.83%

-26.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.63%

74.88%

-25.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.63%

74.88%

-25.25%