NCIQ vs. EZET
Compare and contrast key facts about Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET).
NCIQ and EZET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NCIQ is a passively managed fund by Hashdex that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Crypto US Settlement Price™ Index. It was launched on Feb 13, 2025. EZET is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jul 23, 2024. Both NCIQ and EZET are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NCIQ vs. EZET - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NCIQ vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF | -23.64% | -10.21% |
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF | -27.89% | 8.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCIQ achieves a -23.64% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -27.89% return.
NCIQ
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- -23.64%
- 6M
- -45.48%
- 1Y
- -19.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZET
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- -27.89%
- 6M
- -50.71%
- 1Y
- 11.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NCIQ vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCIQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
NCIQ vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank
NCIQ
EZET
NCIQ vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCIQ | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | 0.16 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | 0.79 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.09 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 0.28 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 0.56 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCIQ | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 0.16 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | -0.33 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between NCIQ and EZET is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NCIQ vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison
Neither NCIQ nor EZET has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
NCIQ vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIQ and EZET.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCIQ | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.90% | -64.05% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.90% | -61.68% | +8.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.93% | -55.80% | +6.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.46% | -30.49% | +12.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.05% | 30.61% | -5.56% |
Volatility
NCIQ vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) is 13.66%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 19.05%. This indicates that NCIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCIQ | EZET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.66% | 19.05% | -5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.15% | 53.59% | -13.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.10% | 75.83% | -26.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.63% | 74.88% | -25.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.63% | 74.88% | -25.25% |