NCIQ vs. ETHD
NCIQ (Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF) and ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. NCIQ is passively managed, while ETHD is actively managed. Over the past year, NCIQ returned -40.00% vs -42.18% for ETHD. At a correlation of -0.90, they often move in opposite directions. NCIQ charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for ETHD.
Performance
NCIQ vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCIQ achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than ETHD's 63.80% return.
NCIQ
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -18.28%
- YTD
- -28.25%
- 6M
- -33.10%
- 1Y
- -40.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD
- 1D
- 11.25%
- 1M
- 66.19%
- YTD
- 63.80%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- -42.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NCIQ vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF | -28.25% | -10.21% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 63.80% | -78.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCIQ and ETHD is -0.92, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2025 | -0.90 |
The correlation between NCIQ and ETHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.92 to -0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCIQ vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank
NCIQ
ETHD
NCIQ vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCIQ | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | -0.31 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | 0.40 | -1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.05 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.51 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -0.64 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCIQ | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | -0.31 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | -0.35 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
NCIQ vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIQ and ETHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCIQ | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.90% | -95.59% | +42.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.90% | -83.63% | +30.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.01% | -87.20% | +35.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.86% | -66.01% | +44.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.94% | 66.00% | -35.06% |
Volatility
NCIQ vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) is 9.56%, while ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD) has a volatility of 19.00%. This indicates that NCIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCIQ | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 19.00% | -9.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.46% | 92.37% | -55.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.21% | 136.23% | -89.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.80% | 142.19% | -94.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.80% | 142.19% | -94.39% |
NCIQ vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCIQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
NCIQ vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison
NCIQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 10.68% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NCIQ and ETHD have a correlation of -0.92, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHD has higher volatility (19.00%) compared to NCIQ (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCIQ dropped -52.90% vs ETHD's -95.59%.
On 1-year performance, NCIQ leads with -40.00% vs -42.18% for ETHD. On fees, NCIQ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, NCIQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NCIQ has performed better with a -40.00% return vs -42.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NCIQ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 10.68%, compared with 0.00% for NCIQ.
They also come from different issuers: Hashdex and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NCIQ and 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NCIQ and ETHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer