PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBXG vs. NML
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NBXG vs. NML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NBXG vs. NML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NBXG
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund
-6.55%24.23%28.53%34.92%-41.41%-10.72%
NML
Neuberger Berman MLP
21.40%4.36%40.55%14.61%32.75%10.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBXG achieves a -6.55% return, which is significantly lower than NML's 21.40% return.


NBXG

1D
2.10%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
-6.55%
6M
-10.53%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
10Y*

NML

1D
-3.62%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
21.40%
6M
20.83%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
26.35%
5Y*
27.89%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBXG vs. NML - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBXG has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is lower than NML's 2.72% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NBXG vs. NML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBXG
NBXG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NBXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBXG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NBXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBXG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

NML
NML Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NML Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NML Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
NML Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NML Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBXG vs. NML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBXGNMLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

0.88

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

1.22

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

1.39

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.23

4.74

-1.50

NBXG vs. NML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBXG Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the NML Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBXG and NML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBXGNMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.88

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.07

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between NBXG and NML is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NBXG vs. NML - Dividend Comparison

NBXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than NML's 6.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBXG
Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund
10.05%8.73%9.42%10.98%13.19%3.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NML
Neuberger Berman MLP
6.92%8.24%7.94%10.19%4.26%3.54%8.33%9.76%9.87%7.04%8.63%15.44%

Drawdowns

NBXG vs. NML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBXG drawdown since its inception was -51.76%, smaller than the maximum NML drawdown of -90.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBXG and NML.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NBXGNMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.76%

-90.48%

+38.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-15.67%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.91%

-4.25%

-6.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.76%

-37.53%

+15.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

4.63%

+0.92%

Volatility

NBXG vs. NML - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Next Generation Connectivity Fund (NBXG) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) at 5.53%. This indicates that NBXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NBXGNMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

5.53%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.57%

13.10%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.52%

22.10%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.14%

23.93%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.14%

35.36%

-9.22%