NBTB vs. CRS
NBTB (NBT Bancorp Inc.) and CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) are both stocks. NBTB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while CRS operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, NBTB returned 9.15%/yr vs 32.06%/yr for CRS. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NBTB vs. CRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBTB achieves a 28.95% return, which is significantly lower than CRS's 65.23% return. Over the past 10 years, NBTB has underperformed CRS with an annualized return of 9.15%, while CRS has yielded a comparatively higher 32.06% annualized return.
NBTB
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 20.50%
- YTD
- 28.95%
- 1Y
- 34.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.08%
CRS
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -12.99%
- 6M
- 63.58%
- YTD
- 65.23%
- 1Y
- 102.13%
- 3Y*
- 106.41%
- 5Y*
- 70.73%
- 10Y*
- 32.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $455.19M | $399.26M | $397.99M | |
NBTB NBT Bancorp Inc. | $24.47M | $21.80M | $18.21M |
NBTB vs. CRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBTB NBT Bancorp Inc. | 28.95% | -10.19% | 17.66% | -0.10% | 16.03% | 23.61% | -18.20% | 20.59% | -3.54% | -9.93% |
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 65.23% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBTB and CRS is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.34 |
The correlation between NBTB and CRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NBTB:
$2.74B
CRS:
$25.82B
NBTB:
$5.64
CRS:
$10.53
NBTB:
9.34
CRS:
49.34
NBTB:
2.23
CRS:
8.37
NBTB:
$895.57M
CRS:
$3.12B
NBTB:
$543.26M
CRS:
$955.40M
NBTB:
$223.42M
CRS:
$797.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBTB vs. CRS — Risk / Return Rank
NBTB
CRS
NBTB vs. CRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBTB | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.37 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 5.87 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 20.89 | -14.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBTB vs. CRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBTB drawdown since its inception was -69.80%, smaller than the maximum CRS drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBTB and CRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBTB | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.80% | -84.68% | +14.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -18.66% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.67% | -28.74% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.88% | -41.86% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.88% | -74.70% | +36.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -16.08% | +13.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.41% | -27.16% | +8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.31% | 5.23% | +0.08% |
Volatility
NBTB vs. CRS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is 6.49%, while Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a volatility of 14.21%. This indicates that NBTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBTB | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 14.21% | -7.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.25% | 33.58% | -17.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.12% | 50.12% | -25.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 46.58% | -17.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.85% | 48.87% | -19.02% |
Dividends
NBTB vs. CRS - Dividend Comparison
NBTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than CRS's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
NBTB NBT Bancorp Inc. | 2.81% | 3.42% | 2.76% | 2.96% | 2.67% | 2.86% | 3.36% | 2.59% | 2.86% | 2.50% | 2.15% | 3.12% |
Financials
NBTB vs. CRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NBT Bancorp Inc. and Carpenter Technology Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NBTB vs. CRS - Profitability Comparison
NBTB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NBT Bancorp Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 185.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 268.90M and revenue of 851.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.6%.
NBTB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NBT Bancorp Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 185.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 206.90M and revenue of 851.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.
NBTB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NBT Bancorp Inc. reported a net income of 53.03M and revenue of 185.76M, resulting in a net margin of 28.6%.
CRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 162.40M and revenue of 851.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NBTB and CRS have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRS has higher volatility (14.21%) compared to NBTB (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBTB dropped -69.80% vs CRS's -84.68%.
CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBTB and CRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer