PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBSSX vs. NBSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBSSX vs. NBSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSSX achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than NBSRX's 11.64% return. Over the past 10 years, NBSSX has underperformed NBSRX with an annualized return of 11.23%, while NBSRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.41% annualized return.


NBSSX

1D
0.20%
1M
6.28%
YTD
6.88%
6M
8.24%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
11.23%

NBSRX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.60%
YTD
11.64%
6M
17.51%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
24.23%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*
14.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSSX vs. NBSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBSSX
Neuberger Berman Focus Fund
6.88%21.36%21.64%23.73%-31.74%19.85%24.45%28.50%-9.02%19.39%
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
11.64%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NBSSX and NBSRX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1994

0.88

The correlation between NBSSX and NBSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBSSX vs. NBSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSSX
NBSSX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NBSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSSX vs. NBSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) and Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBSSXNBSRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

2.17

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

3.19

-0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.85

-0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.42

12.30

-4.88

NBSSX vs. NBSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the NBSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSSX and NBSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBSSXNBSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.17

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.85

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.83

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.59

-0.20

Drawdowns

NBSSX vs. NBSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSSX drawdown since its inception was -61.56%, which is greater than NBSRX's maximum drawdown of -53.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSSX and NBSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBSSXNBSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.56%

-53.74%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-10.03%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.39%

-16.28%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.77%

-25.39%

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.77%

-34.07%

-6.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-7.06%

-5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.32%

+0.86%

Volatility

NBSSX vs. NBSRX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Focus Fund (NBSSX) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) at 2.80%. This indicates that NBSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBSSXNBSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

2.80%

+1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

10.47%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

13.19%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

16.14%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

17.49%

+1.70%

NBSSX vs. NBSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSSX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than NBSRX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBSSX vs. NBSRX - Dividend Comparison

NBSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.15%, more than NBSRX's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.11%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%
NBSSX
Neuberger Berman Focus Fund
9.15%9.78%0.19%0.59%0.05%19.35%5.37%12.78%9.08%8.32%9.59%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBSSX and NBSRX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBSSX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to NBSRX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSSX dropped -61.56% vs NBSRX's -53.74%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBSSX and NBSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer