PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBSRX vs. NBRFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBSRX vs. NBRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NBSRX having a 10.59% return and NBRFX slightly higher at 11.05%. Over the past 10 years, NBSRX has outperformed NBRFX with an annualized return of 14.30%, while NBRFX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.41% annualized return.


NBSRX

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.89%
YTD
10.59%
6M
16.27%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
14.30%

NBRFX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
11.05%
6M
10.14%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
6.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSRX vs. NBRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
10.59%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%
NBRFX
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund
11.05%-2.14%5.02%11.70%-27.35%47.87%-1.34%31.06%-5.31%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NBSRX and NBRFX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2002

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between NBSRX and NBRFX has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBSRX vs. NBRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NBRFX
NBRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NBRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NBRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSRX vs. NBRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBSRXNBRFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.13

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.17

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

3.21

+8.46

NBSRX vs. NBRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the NBRFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSRX and NBRFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBSRXNBRFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

0.70

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.12

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.32

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.32

+0.27

Drawdowns

NBSRX vs. NBRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSRX drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, smaller than the maximum NBRFX drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSRX and NBRFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBSRXNBRFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.74%

-70.52%

+16.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-7.84%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.28%

-18.06%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-35.60%

+10.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.07%

-37.56%

+3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-7.40%

+6.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-11.82%

+4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.84%

-0.52%

Volatility

NBSRX vs. NBRFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) is 2.94%, while Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund (NBRFX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that NBSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBSRXNBRFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.62%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

9.51%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

13.05%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

19.78%

-3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

20.34%

-2.85%

NBSRX vs. NBRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSRX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than NBRFX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBSRX vs. NBRFX - Dividend Comparison

NBSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than NBRFX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBRFX
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund
1.83%2.07%1.94%2.11%12.58%7.76%2.03%4.73%6.98%6.43%14.86%9.29%
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.13%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBSRX and NBRFX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBRFX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to NBSRX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSRX dropped -53.74% vs NBRFX's -70.52%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBSRX and NBRFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer