PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBSRX vs. VSMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBSRX vs. VSMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBSRX achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than VSMPX's 11.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NBSRX having a 14.57% annualized return and VSMPX not far ahead at 14.72%.


NBSRX

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.70%
6M
13.68%
YTD
15.65%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
14.57%

VSMPX

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.07%
6M
9.52%
YTD
11.36%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
14.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBSRX vs. VSMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
15.65%17.37%28.23%26.76%-18.81%23.30%19.35%25.95%-6.00%18.84%
VSMPX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.36%17.15%23.26%26.53%-19.50%25.74%21.01%30.79%-5.16%21.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NBSRX and VSMPX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.94

The correlation between NBSRX and VSMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBSRX vs. VSMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBSRX
NBSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NBSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NBSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMPX
VSMPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VSMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBSRX vs. VSMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBSRXVSMPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.48

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

10.88

+0.74

NBSRX vs. VSMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBSRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the VSMPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBSRX and VSMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBSRX vs. VSMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBSRX drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than VSMPX's maximum drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBSRX and VSMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBSRXVSMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.74%

-34.97%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-8.92%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.28%

-19.36%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-25.35%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.07%

-34.97%

+0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-0.56%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-4.56%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.03%

+0.40%

Volatility

NBSRX vs. VSMPX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund (NBSRX) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX) at 3.58%. This indicates that NBSRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBSRXVSMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.07%

3.58%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

10.16%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

12.86%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

17.46%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

18.39%

-0.90%

NBSRX vs. VSMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBSRX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBSRX vs. VSMPX - Dividend Comparison

NBSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than VSMPX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBSRX
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund
2.03%2.35%5.88%9.72%10.06%10.35%6.16%9.08%10.03%6.14%4.53%6.40%
VSMPX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.06%1.13%1.27%1.43%1.67%1.22%1.43%1.78%2.05%1.73%1.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBSRX and VSMPX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBSRX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to VSMPX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBSRX dropped -53.74% vs VSMPX's -34.97%.

NBSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBSRX and VSMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer