VSMPX vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

VSMPX (Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - VSMPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VSMPX returned 15.08%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VSMPX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

VSMPX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSMPX achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSMPX having a 15.08% annualized return and VOO not far ahead at 15.77%.

VSMPX

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 9.94%
• 1Y: 27.59%
• 3Y*: 20.69%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 15.08%

VOO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 9.75%
• 6M: 9.30%
• 1Y: 26.77%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 13.58%
• 10Y*: 15.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSMPX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VSMPX Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares	10.73%	17.15%	23.26%	26.53%	-19.50%	25.74%	21.01%	30.79%	-5.16%	21.19%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	9.75%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VSMPX and VOO is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.99

The correlation between VSMPX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSMPX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VSMPX	VOO
Technology	37.0%	39.1%
Financial Services	11.3%	10.9%
Communication Services	9.8%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	9.8%
Industrials	9.4%	7.6%
Healthcare	9.0%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	4.5%
Energy	3.3%	3.2%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.8%
Utilities	2.1%	2.5%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.7%

Return for Risk

VSMPX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSMPX

VSMPX Risk / Return Rank: 66
VSMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VSMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VSMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VSMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
VSMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 68
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSMPX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VSMPX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.17	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	2.93	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.39	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	3.02	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.79	13.58	+0.21

VSMPX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSMPX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VSMPX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSMPX drawdown since its inception was -34.97%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMPX and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSMPX	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.97%	-33.99%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-8.90%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.36%	-18.69%	-0.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.35%	-24.52%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.97%	-33.99%	-0.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-1.74%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-3.68%	-0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.98%	+0.01%

Volatility

VSMPX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that VSMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSMPX	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	4.60%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.11%	9.73%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.80%	12.39%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.45%	16.90%	+0.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.45%	18.05%	+0.40%

VSMPX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSMPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VSMPX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VSMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, which matches VOO's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%
VSMPX Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares	1.03%	1.13%	1.27%	1.43%	1.67%	1.22%	1.43%	1.78%	2.05%	1.73%	1.95%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSMPX and VOO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, VSMPX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VSMPX or VOO?

VSMPX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMPX dropped -34.97% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.