PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBRVX vs. NLSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBRVX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBRVX achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly higher than NLSIX's 2.34% return. Over the past 10 years, NBRVX has outperformed NLSIX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while NLSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.86% annualized return.


NBRVX

1D
1.47%
1M
7.79%
YTD
15.38%
6M
16.61%
1Y
33.32%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
7.85%

NLSIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.64%
YTD
2.34%
6M
1.99%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
6.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBRVX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBRVX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund
15.38%11.01%9.11%11.05%-9.75%32.67%-4.29%17.22%-14.98%9.69%
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
2.34%7.20%7.47%13.10%-6.85%9.01%15.27%17.11%-6.92%13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between NBRVX and NLSIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2011

0.70

The correlation between NBRVX and NLSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBRVX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBRVX
NBRVX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NBRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NBRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

NLSIX
NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBRVX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBRVXNLSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.23

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

1.41

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.79

5.44

+8.35

NBRVX vs. NLSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBRVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the NLSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBRVX and NLSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBRVXNLSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

1.26

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.86

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.94

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.96

-0.66

Drawdowns

NBRVX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBRVX drawdown since its inception was -65.68%, which is greater than NLSIX's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRVX and NLSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBRVXNLSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.68%

-14.75%

-50.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-4.39%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.62%

-6.90%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

-10.79%

-13.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.24%

-14.75%

-37.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.58%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-2.02%

-8.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.13%

+1.44%

Volatility

NBRVX vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) at 1.42%. This indicates that NBRVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBRVXNLSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

1.42%

+2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

3.93%

+7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

4.91%

+10.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.28%

6.66%

+12.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

7.32%

+14.16%

NBRVX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBRVX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBRVX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison

NBRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.73%, more than NLSIX's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBRVX
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund
9.73%11.23%6.19%1.94%0.90%0.54%0.04%1.10%9.15%0.49%0.52%12.52%
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
0.05%0.05%0.02%0.97%7.01%1.13%2.15%2.39%5.91%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBRVX and NLSIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBRVX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to NLSIX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRVX dropped -65.68% vs NLSIX's -14.75%.

NBRVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBRVX and NLSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer