NBRVX vs. FASPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NBRVX (Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund) and FASPX (Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NBRVX returned 7.85%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for FASPX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBRVX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for FASPX.

Performance

NBRVX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBRVX achieves a 15.38% return, which is significantly lower than FASPX's 20.76% return. Over the past 10 years, NBRVX has underperformed FASPX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while FASPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.60% annualized return.

NBRVX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 7.79%
• YTD: 15.38%
• 6M: 16.61%
• 1Y: 33.32%
• 3Y*: 16.13%
• 5Y*: 7.68%
• 10Y*: 7.85%

FASPX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 20.76%
• 6M: 22.32%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: 10.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBRVX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NBRVX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund	15.38%	11.01%	9.11%	11.05%	-9.75%	32.67%	-4.29%	17.22%	-14.98%	9.69%
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M	20.76%	7.76%	-2.60%	19.93%	-7.82%	32.65%	7.70%	33.85%	-17.27%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NBRVX and FASPX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1999	0.90

The correlation between NBRVX and FASPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NBRVX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBRVX

NBRVX Risk / Return Rank: 64
NBRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
NBRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
NBRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
NBRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NBRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

FASPX

FASPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FASPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FASPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FASPX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FASPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FASPX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBRVX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBRVX	FASPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.49	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.52	-0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.42	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	4.30	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.79	15.87	-2.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBRVX vs. FASPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBRVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FASPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBRVX and FASPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBRVX	FASPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	2.49	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.38	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.48	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.41	-0.12

Drawdowns

NBRVX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBRVX drawdown since its inception was -65.68%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBRVX and FASPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBRVX	FASPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.68%	-70.11%	+4.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.88%	-9.84%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.62%	-34.53%	+9.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.62%	-34.53%	+9.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.24%	-48.02%	-4.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-9.83%	-0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.66%	-0.09%

Volatility

NBRVX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund (NBRVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBRVX	FASPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	4.27%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.15%	11.92%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.53%	17.00%	-1.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.28%	20.68%	-1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.48%	22.01%	-0.53%

NBRVX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBRVX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBRVX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison

NBRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.73%, more than FASPX's 7.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M	7.72%	9.32%	0.00%	2.40%	1.93%	7.80%	0.55%	4.98%	15.67%	7.26%	21.61%	0.80%
NBRVX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund	9.73%	11.23%	6.19%	1.94%	0.90%	0.54%	0.04%	1.10%	9.15%	0.49%	0.52%	12.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBRVX and FASPX in my portfolio?

NBRVX and FASPX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBRVX or FASPX?

NBRVX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to FASPX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBRVX dropped -65.68% vs FASPX's -70.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.