NBNGX vs. VMFGX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

NBNGX (SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund) and VMFGX (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NBNGX returned 16.14%/yr vs 11.85%/yr for VMFGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBNGX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VMFGX.

Performance

NBNGX vs. VMFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBNGX achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than VMFGX's 19.74% return. Over the past 10 years, NBNGX has outperformed VMFGX with an annualized return of 16.14%, while VMFGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.85% annualized return.

NBNGX

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: 2.36%
• YTD: 10.34%
• 6M: 10.08%
• 1Y: 22.79%
• 3Y*: 31.70%
• 5Y*: 16.23%
• 10Y*: 16.14%

VMFGX

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 4.51%
• YTD: 19.74%
• 6M: 18.22%
• 1Y: 31.93%
• 3Y*: 17.38%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: 11.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBNGX vs. VMFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund	10.34%	8.72%	74.13%	21.98%	-24.10%	15.78%	33.16%	30.27%	-7.42%	19.01%
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	19.74%	7.43%	15.86%	17.42%	-18.99%	18.83%	22.61%	26.20%	-10.39%	19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between NBNGX and VMFGX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.92

The correlation between NBNGX and VMFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NBNGX vs. VMFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBNGX

NBNGX Risk / Return Rank: 28
NBNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NBNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
NBNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NBNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
NBNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

VMFGX

VMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 58
VMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
VMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
VMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
VMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
VMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBNGX vs. VMFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBNGX	VMFGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.84	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	2.61	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.32	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	3.23	-0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.76	12.76	-5.00

NBNGX vs. VMFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBNGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VMFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBNGX and VMFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NBNGX vs. VMFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBNGX drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, which is greater than VMFGX's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBNGX and VMFGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBNGX	VMFGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.94%	-39.15%	-31.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.70%	-9.91%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.71%	-25.45%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.84%	-29.25%	-5.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.14%	-39.15%	+4.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-0.13%	-3.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.12%	-5.69%	-15.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	2.50%	+0.37%

Volatility

NBNGX vs. VMFGX - Volatility Comparison

SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) at 5.83%. This indicates that NBNGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBNGX	VMFGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.04%	5.83%	+2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.67%	13.71%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.20%	17.38%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.13%	20.70%	+9.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.92%	21.10%	+4.82%

NBNGX vs. VMFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBNGX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFGX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBNGX vs. VMFGX - Dividend Comparison

NBNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than VMFGX's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund	3.07%	3.39%	38.38%	0.47%	3.08%	12.28%	4.17%	7.51%	12.40%	4.24%	1.00%	18.44%
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.59%	0.70%	0.84%	1.21%	1.12%	0.53%	0.79%	1.22%	1.18%	0.93%	1.14%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBNGX and VMFGX in my portfolio?

NBNGX and VMFGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBNGX or VMFGX?

NBNGX has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to VMFGX (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBNGX dropped -70.94% vs VMFGX's -39.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.