VMFGX vs. FSMAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX).
VMFGX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Mar 28, 2011. FSMAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
VMFGX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VMFGX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | 0.45% | 7.43% | 15.86% | 17.42% | -18.99% | 18.83% | 22.61% | 26.20% | -10.39% | 19.87% |
FSMAX Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund | -4.54% | 11.40% | 16.99% | 25.36% | -26.44% | 12.41% | 32.28% | 28.01% | -9.44% | 18.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMFGX achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than FSMAX's -4.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VMFGX having a 10.21% annualized return and FSMAX not far ahead at 10.54%.
VMFGX
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
FSMAX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -4.54%
- 6M
- -4.39%
- 1Y
- 16.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMFGX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMFGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VMFGX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank
VMFGX
FSMAX
VMFGX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMFGX | FSMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.72 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.16 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.16 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 0.95 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 3.91 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMFGX | FSMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.72 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.16 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.35 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.41 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between VMFGX and FSMAX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VMFGX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison
VMFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than FSMAX's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | 0.70% | 0.70% | 0.84% | 1.21% | 1.12% | 0.53% | 0.79% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 0.93% | 1.14% | 1.14% |
FSMAX Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.48% | 1.17% | 1.90% | 7.49% | 2.14% | 4.30% | 6.09% | 5.44% | 4.85% | 6.34% |
Drawdowns
VMFGX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMFGX drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum FSMAX drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFGX and FSMAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMFGX | FSMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.15% | -50.55% | +11.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.68% | -14.64% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.25% | -36.31% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.15% | -50.55% | +11.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.91% | -10.26% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -12.29% | +6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.54% | -0.41% |
Volatility
VMFGX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) at 6.01%. This indicates that VMFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VMFGX | FSMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 6.01% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 13.07% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 22.79% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 22.32% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 30.19% | -9.22% |