PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VMFGX vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VMFGX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VMFGX achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VMFGX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 11.68%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


VMFGX

1D
0.71%
1M
5.67%
YTD
18.87%
6M
19.12%
1Y
29.92%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
11.68%

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VMFGX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VMFGX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
18.87%7.43%15.86%17.42%-18.99%18.83%22.61%26.20%-10.39%19.87%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VMFGX and VT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.87

The correlation between VMFGX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VMFGX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VMFGX
VMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VMFGX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VMFGXVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

2.31

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

3.20

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.04

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.69

13.53

-0.84

VMFGX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VMFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VMFGX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VMFGXVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.31

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.69

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.74

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.44

+0.21

Drawdowns

VMFGX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VMFGX drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMFGX and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VMFGXVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-50.27%

+11.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-9.67%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.45%

-16.51%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.25%

-26.38%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

-34.24%

-4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.88%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-7.02%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.17%

+0.31%

Volatility

VMFGX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that VMFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VMFGXVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

3.83%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

10.17%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

12.70%

+4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

16.05%

+4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

17.23%

+3.82%

VMFGX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VMFGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VMFGX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VMFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VMFGX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.59%0.70%0.84%1.21%1.12%0.53%0.79%1.22%1.18%0.93%1.14%1.14%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VMFGX and VT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VMFGX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMFGX dropped -39.15% vs VT's -50.27%.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VMFGX and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer