NBNGX vs. SQIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and Sit Quality Income Fund (SQIFX).
NBNGX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Sep 2, 1982. SQIFX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Dec 31, 2012.
Performance
NBNGX vs. SQIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBNGX vs. SQIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund | -3.41% | 8.72% | 74.13% | 21.98% | -24.10% | 15.78% | 33.16% | 30.27% | -7.42% | 19.01% |
SQIFX Sit Quality Income Fund | 0.16% | 6.32% | 3.93% | 3.39% | -2.68% | 1.24% | 2.89% | 3.13% | 0.90% | 1.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBNGX achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than SQIFX's 0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, NBNGX has outperformed SQIFX with an annualized return of 14.59%, while SQIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.08% annualized return.
NBNGX
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -3.53%
- 1Y
- 17.39%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.59%
SQIFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBNGX vs. SQIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBNGX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SQIFX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBNGX vs. SQIFX — Risk / Return Rank
NBNGX
SQIFX
NBNGX vs. SQIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and Sit Quality Income Fund (SQIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBNGX | SQIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.70 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 2.73 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.34 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.93 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 10.48 | -4.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBNGX | SQIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.70 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 1.03 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 1.18 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.05 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBNGX and SQIFX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NBNGX vs. SQIFX - Dividend Comparison
NBNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than SQIFX's 3.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 3.51% | 3.39% | 38.38% | 0.47% | 3.08% | 12.28% | 4.17% | 7.51% | 12.40% | 4.24% | 1.00% | 18.44% |
SQIFX Sit Quality Income Fund | 3.86% | 4.21% | 3.96% | 2.78% | 3.42% | 1.23% | 1.13% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 0.95% |
Drawdowns
NBNGX vs. SQIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBNGX drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, which is greater than SQIFX's maximum drawdown of -4.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBNGX and SQIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBNGX | SQIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.94% | -4.22% | -66.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -1.55% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | -4.22% | -30.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.14% | -4.22% | -30.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -1.03% | -5.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.26% | -0.45% | -20.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 0.43% | +2.68% |
Volatility
NBNGX vs. SQIFX - Volatility Comparison
SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Sit Quality Income Fund (SQIFX) at 0.81%. This indicates that NBNGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBNGX | SQIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 0.81% | +6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 1.54% | +11.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 2.47% | +19.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 2.29% | +27.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.79% | 1.77% | +24.02% |