NBNGX vs. SDMGX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX).

NBNGX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Sep 2, 1982. SDMGX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Jun 30, 1994.

Performance

NBNGX vs. SDMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NBNGX vs. SDMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund	-3.41%	8.72%	74.13%	21.98%	-24.10%	15.78%	33.16%	30.27%	-7.42%	19.01%
SDMGX SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund	-0.73%	36.11%	13.58%	7.37%	-17.23%	-8.88%	23.14%	19.77%	-14.76%	43.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBNGX achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than SDMGX's -0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, NBNGX has outperformed SDMGX with an annualized return of 14.59%, while SDMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.67% annualized return.

NBNGX

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: -6.66%
• YTD: -3.41%
• 6M: -3.53%
• 1Y: 17.39%
• 3Y*: 27.75%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 14.59%

SDMGX

• 1D: 2.76%
• 1M: -8.84%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: 4.80%
• 1Y: 37.43%
• 3Y*: 15.48%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: 8.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBNGX vs. SDMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBNGX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SDMGX's 1.20% expense ratio.

NBNGX

SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund

SDMGX

SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund

Return for Risk

NBNGX vs. SDMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBNGX

NBNGX Risk / Return Rank: 38
NBNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
NBNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
NBNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
NBNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
NBNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

SDMGX

SDMGX Risk / Return Rank: 89
SDMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SDMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SDMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
SDMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SDMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBNGX vs. SDMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBNGX	SDMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	1.95	-1.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	2.60	-1.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.38	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	2.87	-1.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.74	11.15	-5.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBNGX vs. SDMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBNGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the SDMGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBNGX and SDMGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBNGX	SDMGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	1.95	-1.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.20	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.45	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.24	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between NBNGX and SDMGX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NBNGX vs. SDMGX - Dividend Comparison

NBNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than SDMGX's 0.88% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund	3.51%	3.39%	38.38%	0.47%	3.08%	12.28%	4.17%	7.51%	12.40%	4.24%	1.00%	18.44%
SDMGX SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund	0.88%	0.87%	4.13%	2.03%	2.44%	2.13%	0.26%	1.75%	1.67%	1.45%	0.27%	3.13%

Drawdowns

NBNGX vs. SDMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBNGX drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, which is greater than SDMGX's maximum drawdown of -67.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBNGX and SDMGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBNGX	SDMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.94%	-67.12%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.32%	-13.00%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.84%	-40.16%	+5.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.14%	-44.63%	+9.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.91%	-10.60%	+3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.26%	-23.72%	+2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	3.35%	-0.24%

Volatility

NBNGX vs. SDMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) is 6.83%, while SIT Developing Markets Growth Fund (SDMGX) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that NBNGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBNGX	SDMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.83%	8.72%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.20%	13.96%	-0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.95%	19.70%	+2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.96%	19.10%	+10.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.79%	19.15%	+6.64%