NBNGX vs. IESGX
Compare and contrast key facts about SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX).
NBNGX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Sep 2, 1982. IESGX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Jun 30, 2016.
Performance
NBNGX vs. IESGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NBNGX vs. IESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund | -3.41% | 8.72% | 74.13% | 21.98% | -24.10% | 15.78% | 33.16% | 30.27% | -7.42% | 19.01% |
IESGX Sit ESG Growth Fund | -5.25% | 19.65% | 19.59% | 26.67% | -21.08% | 19.93% | 15.91% | 26.41% | -7.38% | 23.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBNGX achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly higher than IESGX's -5.25% return.
NBNGX
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- -6.66%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -3.53%
- 1Y
- 17.39%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.59%
IESGX
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 6M
- -3.56%
- 1Y
- 16.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBNGX vs. IESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBNGX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IESGX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NBNGX vs. IESGX — Risk / Return Rank
NBNGX
IESGX
NBNGX vs. IESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) and Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBNGX | IESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.99 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.54 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.60 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 6.74 | -1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBNGX | IESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.99 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.59 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.66 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between NBNGX and IESGX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NBNGX vs. IESGX - Dividend Comparison
NBNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than IESGX's 1.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBNGX SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund | 3.51% | 3.39% | 38.38% | 0.47% | 3.08% | 12.28% | 4.17% | 7.51% | 12.40% | 4.24% | 1.00% | 18.44% |
IESGX Sit ESG Growth Fund | 1.25% | 1.19% | 0.06% | 0.77% | 3.29% | 1.43% | 0.58% | 1.54% | 1.41% | 0.91% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NBNGX vs. IESGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBNGX drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, which is greater than IESGX's maximum drawdown of -32.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBNGX and IESGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBNGX | IESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.94% | -32.15% | -38.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -10.45% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | -29.64% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -6.88% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.26% | -5.15% | -16.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.49% | +0.62% |
Volatility
NBNGX vs. IESGX - Volatility Comparison
SIT Mid Cap Growth Fund (NBNGX) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) at 5.60%. This indicates that NBNGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NBNGX | IESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 5.60% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 9.55% | +3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 16.80% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 16.11% | +13.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.79% | 16.82% | +8.97% |