PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IESGX vs. GDGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IESGX vs. GDGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund (GDGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IESGX achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than GDGIX's 10.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IESGX having a 12.05% annualized return and GDGIX not far behind at 11.68%.


IESGX

1D
1.47%
1M
1.54%
6M
7.08%
YTD
7.61%
1Y
17.20%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
12.05%
ALL TIME*
12.13%

GDGIX

1D
1.96%
1M
1.50%
6M
9.10%
YTD
10.77%
1Y
20.78%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
11.68%
ALL TIME*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IESGX vs. GDGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IESGX
Sit ESG Growth Fund
7.61%19.65%19.59%26.67%-21.08%19.93%15.91%26.41%-7.38%23.71%
GDGIX
Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund
10.77%16.68%16.80%23.12%-18.05%23.59%16.01%26.70%-9.65%19.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IESGX and GDGIX is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2016

0.97

The correlation between IESGX and GDGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IESGX vs. GDGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IESGX
IESGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
IESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GDGIX
GDGIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GDGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GDGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IESGX vs. GDGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund (GDGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IESGXGDGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.29

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

9.14

-2.87

IESGX vs. GDGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IESGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the GDGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IESGX and GDGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IESGX vs. GDGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IESGX drawdown since its inception was -32.15%, smaller than the maximum GDGIX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESGX and GDGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IESGXGDGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.15%

-33.91%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-8.12%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.86%

-14.69%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-26.60%

-3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.15%

-33.91%

+1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-4.56%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.04%

+0.39%

Volatility

IESGX vs. GDGIX - Volatility Comparison

Sit ESG Growth Fund (IESGX) and Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund (GDGIX) have volatilities of 3.26% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IESGXGDGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.21%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

9.80%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

12.39%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

15.17%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

16.35%

+0.42%

IESGX vs. GDGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IESGX and GDGIX have an expense ratio of 1.00%.


Dividends

IESGX vs. GDGIX - Dividend Comparison

IESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than GDGIX's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDGIX
Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund
1.24%1.38%2.47%1.03%1.11%0.69%1.03%1.59%1.93%1.50%2.11%9.52%
IESGX
Sit ESG Growth Fund
1.10%1.19%0.06%0.77%3.29%1.43%0.58%1.54%1.41%0.91%0.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IESGX and GDGIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IESGX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to GDGIX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IESGX dropped -32.15% vs GDGIX's -33.91%.

GDGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IESGX and GDGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer