NBMIX vs. NMANX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

NBMIX (Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund) and NMANX (Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - NBMIX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Neuberger Berman, while NMANX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Neuberger Berman. Over the past 10 years, NBMIX returned 14.07%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for NMANX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NBMIX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for NMANX.

Performance

NBMIX vs. NMANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) and Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBMIX achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly higher than NMANX's 3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, NBMIX has outperformed NMANX with an annualized return of 14.07%, while NMANX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.

NBMIX

• 1D: -1.94%
• 1M: -4.44%
• 6M: 1.91%
• YTD: 12.56%
• 1Y: 24.24%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 14.07%

NMANX

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: -4.95%
• 6M: -2.26%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 1Y: -1.37%
• 3Y*: 11.15%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 11.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBMIX vs. NMANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NBMIX Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund	12.56%	9.87%	25.90%	10.01%	-24.43%	4.16%	42.83%	34.55%	4.80%	28.16%
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund	3.41%	5.51%	24.39%	18.21%	-28.82%	12.42%	39.45%	33.62%	-6.28%	29.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NBMIX and NMANX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 1998	0.92

The correlation between NBMIX and NMANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NBMIX vs. NMANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBMIX

NBMIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
NBMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
NBMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
NBMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
NBMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
NBMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

NMANX

NMANX Risk / Return Rank: 3
NMANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NMANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
NMANX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
NMANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
NMANX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBMIX vs. NMANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) and Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NBMIX	NMANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	-0.02	+1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	0.12	+1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.01	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	-0.03	+1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.46	-0.08	+5.54

NBMIX vs. NMANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBMIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the NMANX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBMIX and NMANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NBMIX vs. NMANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBMIX drawdown since its inception was -78.77%, which is greater than NMANX's maximum drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBMIX and NMANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBMIX	NMANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.77%	-72.14%	-6.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.65%	-17.71%	+1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.53%	-25.93%	-3.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.96%	-38.10%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.55%	-38.10%	-1.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.05%	-7.62%	-1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.38%	-17.37%	-17.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.77%	6.18%	-1.41%

Volatility

NBMIX vs. NMANX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) at 6.57%. This indicates that NBMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBMIX	NMANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.46%	6.57%	+1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.40%	17.45%	+3.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.74%	21.94%	+4.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.28%	23.50%	+1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.58%	22.55%	+2.03%

NBMIX vs. NMANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBMIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than NMANX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBMIX vs. NMANX - Dividend Comparison

NBMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, less than NMANX's 22.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBMIX Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund	5.98%	6.74%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	18.71%	1.06%	3.98%	23.77%	1.44%	0.00%	5.92%
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund	22.33%	23.10%	9.85%	3.19%	4.87%	16.30%	9.58%	5.43%	11.70%	8.94%	5.00%	9.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBMIX and NMANX in my portfolio?

NBMIX and NMANX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBMIX or NMANX?

NBMIX has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to NMANX (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBMIX dropped -78.77% vs NMANX's -72.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.