PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBMIX vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBMIX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBMIX achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 11.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NBMIX having a 14.90% annualized return and SCHX not far ahead at 15.49%.


NBMIX

1D
-1.72%
1M
3.57%
YTD
17.21%
6M
16.54%
1Y
37.09%
3Y*
19.61%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
14.90%

SCHX

1D
0.20%
1M
5.43%
YTD
11.50%
6M
11.84%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBMIX vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBMIX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund
17.21%9.87%25.90%10.01%-24.43%4.16%42.83%34.55%4.80%28.16%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
11.50%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between NBMIX and SCHX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.84

The correlation between NBMIX and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBMIX vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBMIX
NBMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NBMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NBMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBMIX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBMIXSCHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

2.45

-0.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

3.32

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.31

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.53

15.11

-6.58

NBMIX vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBMIX and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBMIXSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.45

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.80

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.86

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.85

-0.45

Drawdowns

NBMIX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBMIX drawdown since its inception was -78.77%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBMIX and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBMIXSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.77%

-34.33%

-44.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.65%

-9.02%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.53%

-19.04%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.96%

-25.41%

-11.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.55%

-34.33%

-5.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

0.00%

-2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.52%

-3.97%

-30.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

1.98%

+2.50%

Volatility

NBMIX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund (NBMIX) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.81%. This indicates that NBMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBMIXSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.54%

2.81%

+5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.32%

9.00%

+10.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.43%

11.97%

+12.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.85%

17.12%

+7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.41%

18.15%

+6.26%

NBMIX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBMIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBMIX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

NBMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than SCHX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBMIX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Fund
5.75%6.74%0.46%0.00%0.00%18.71%1.06%3.98%23.77%1.44%0.00%5.92%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.00%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBMIX and SCHX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBMIX has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to SCHX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBMIX dropped -78.77% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBMIX and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer