NBIZ vs. SH
NBIZ (Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds - NBIZ tracks the Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) while SH tracks the S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). Both are passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NBIZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SH.
Performance
NBIZ vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIZ
- 1D
- -3.01%
- 1M
- -13.55%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SH
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -6.38%
- YTD
- -7.86%
- 1Y
- -13.68%
- 3Y*
- -12.12%
- 5Y*
- -8.40%
- 10Y*
- -12.62%
NBIZ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF | -96.04% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -7.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIZ and SH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIZ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
NBIZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SH
NBIZ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIZ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -98.35%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.35% | -94.66% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.70% | -94.61% | -3.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.64% | -67.85% | -6.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.36% | — |
Volatility
NBIZ vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 217.33% | 12.47% | +204.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 217.33% | 16.95% | +200.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 217.33% | 17.99% | +199.34% |
NBIZ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIZ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
NBIZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.24% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIZ and SH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 0.00% for NBIZ.
NBIZ tracks Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS), while SH tracks S&P 500 Index (-100% daily). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 0.89% for SH.
Find the right allocation for NBIZ and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer