NBIZ vs. DOG
NBIZ (Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both Inverse Equities funds - NBIZ tracks the Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) while DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NBIZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.
Performance
NBIZ vs. DOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIZ
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -37.07%
- 6M
- -98.00%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DOG
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 1Y
- -13.86%
- 3Y*
- -7.85%
- 5Y*
- -5.65%
- 10Y*
- -11.12%
- ALL TIME*
- -10.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.27M | $36.96M | $41.35M | |
| $76.41M | $57.60M | $42.81M |
NBIZ vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF | -97.27% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -4.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIZ and DOG is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIZ vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank
NBIZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DOG
NBIZ vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIZ | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIZ vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than DOG's maximum drawdown of -92.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and DOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIZ | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.41% | -92.90% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.41% | -92.81% | -5.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.23% | -66.59% | -10.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.60% | — |
Volatility
NBIZ vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIZ | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 237.50% | 12.59% | +224.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 237.50% | 14.83% | +222.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 237.50% | 17.49% | +220.01% |
NBIZ vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIZ vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison
NBIZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.38% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIZ and DOG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 0.00% for NBIZ.
NBIZ tracks Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS), while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 0.95% for DOG.
Find the right allocation for NBIZ and DOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer