NBIZ vs. CARD
NBIZ (Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds - NBIZ tracks the Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) while CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NBIZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
NBIZ vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIZ
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -54.39%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARD
- 1D
- 5.71%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 14.44%
- 1Y
- -35.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBIZ vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIZ Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF | -97.09% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIZ and CARD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIZ vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
NBIZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CARD
NBIZ vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIZ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.96 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIZ vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -98.35%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIZ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.35% | -93.51% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -46.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.31% | -92.26% | -6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.75% | -68.68% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 31.43% | — |
Volatility
NBIZ vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIZ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 52.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 213.40% | 70.33% | +143.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 213.40% | 80.77% | +132.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 213.40% | 80.77% | +132.63% |
NBIZ vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIZ vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIZ nor CARD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIZ and CARD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.
NBIZ and CARD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NBIZ tracks Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 0.95% for CARD.
Find the right allocation for NBIZ and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer