PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIZ vs. CARD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBIZ vs. CARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NBIZ

1D
2.58%
1M
-54.39%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CARD

1D
5.71%
1M
0.62%
YTD
2.96%
6M
14.44%
1Y
-35.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIZ vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NBIZ and CARD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIZ vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CARD
CARD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIZ vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short NBIS Daily ETF (NBIZ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBIZCARDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.13

NBIZ vs. CARD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBIZ vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIZ drawdown since its inception was -98.35%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIZ and CARD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBIZCARDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.35%

-93.51%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.31%

-92.26%

-6.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.75%

-68.68%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.43%

Volatility

NBIZ vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBIZCARDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

213.40%

70.33%

+143.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

213.40%

80.77%

+132.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

213.40%

80.77%

+132.63%

NBIZ vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBIZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBIZ vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBIZ nor CARD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIZ and CARD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for NBIZ.

NBIZ and CARD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NBIZ tracks Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for NBIZ and 0.95% for CARD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIZ and CARD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer