PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIS vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NBIS vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 118.17% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -27.15% return.


NBIS

1D
2.76%
1M
-36.30%
6M
67.96%
YTD
118.17%
1Y
245.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
264.48%

IBM

1D
0.16%
1M
-14.49%
6M
-29.40%
YTD
-27.15%
1Y
-23.58%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
7.64%
ALL TIME*
7.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIS vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
118.17%202.18%46.25%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
-27.15%38.23%-4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIS and IBM is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.12

The correlation between NBIS and IBM shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NBIS:

$43.83B

IBM:

$200.20B

EPS

NBIS:

$3.08

IBM:

$11.31

PE Ratio

NBIS:

59.23

IBM:

18.84

PEG Ratio

NBIS:

20.35

IBM:

0.23

PS Ratio

NBIS:

56.43

IBM:

2.94

PB Ratio

NBIS:

7.79

IBM:

6.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

NBIS:

$877.90M

IBM:

$68.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NBIS:

$420.60M

IBM:

$40.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

NBIS:

-$52.78M

IBM:

$15.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIS vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIS vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBISIBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.94

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.45

-0.66

+6.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

-1.53

+13.40

NBIS vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBIS Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIS and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBIS vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, smaller than the maximum IBM drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and IBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBISIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.27%

-69.40%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.47%

-35.85%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.30%

-35.30%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-20.12%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.83%

15.44%

+5.39%

Volatility

NBIS vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) have volatilities of 32.60% and 32.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBISIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.60%

32.02%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.89%

46.34%

+29.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.91%

48.36%

+58.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

110.41%

29.86%

+80.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

110.41%

27.97%

+82.44%

Dividends

NBIS vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

NBIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
3.16%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NBIS vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nebius Group N.V. and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
399.00M
15.92B
(NBIS) Total Revenue
(IBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIS and IBM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (32.60%) compared to IBM (32.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIS dropped -58.27% vs IBM's -69.40%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIS and IBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer