PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBIS vs. HLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NBIS vs. HLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBIS achieves a 160.44% return, which is significantly higher than HLT's 18.69% return.


NBIS

1D
-4.31%
1M
23.13%
YTD
160.44%
6M
117.28%
1Y
351.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HLT

1D
-0.72%
1M
7.58%
YTD
18.69%
6M
26.36%
1Y
35.01%
3Y*
34.37%
5Y*
22.25%
10Y*
48.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBIS vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
160.44%202.18%46.25%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
18.69%16.49%3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between NBIS and HLT is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024

0.14

The correlation between NBIS and HLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NBIS:

$67.36B

HLT:

$79.03B

EPS

NBIS:

$3.17

HLT:

$6.50

PE Ratio

NBIS:

68.67

HLT:

52.41

PEG Ratio

NBIS:

23.59

HLT:

0.85

PS Ratio

NBIS:

65.42

HLT:

6.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

NBIS:

$877.90M

HLT:

$12.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NBIS:

$420.60M

HLT:

$5.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

NBIS:

-$52.78M

HLT:

$3.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBIS vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

HLT
HLT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBIS vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBISHLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.27

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.79

3.42

+4.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.86

7.93

+9.93

NBIS vs. HLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBIS Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is higher than the HLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBIS and HLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBISHLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

1.52

+1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.19

0.23

+2.95

Drawdowns

NBIS vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and HLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBISHLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.27%

-50.82%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.47%

-10.29%

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.58%

-0.72%

-16.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.02%

-9.73%

-9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.79%

4.43%

+15.36%

Volatility

NBIS vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison

Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 33.60% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) at 6.93%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBISHLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.60%

6.93%

+26.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.53%

17.33%

+54.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.78%

23.12%

+81.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

110.72%

27.07%

+83.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

110.72%

181.03%

-70.31%

Dividends

NBIS vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison

NBIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
0.18%0.21%0.24%0.33%0.36%0.00%0.13%0.54%0.84%31.40%1.03%0.65%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NBIS vs. HLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nebius Group N.V. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
399.00M
2.94B
(NBIS) Total Revenue
(HLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NBIS and HLT have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (33.60%) compared to HLT (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIS dropped -58.27% vs HLT's -50.82%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBIS and HLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer