NBIG vs. GSIG
NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) and GSIG (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NBIG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while GSIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Investment-Grade Corporate Bond 1-5 Years Index. NBIG is actively managed, while GSIG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. NBIG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for GSIG.
Performance
NBIG vs. GSIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBIG achieves a 526.74% return, which is significantly higher than GSIG's 0.68% return.
NBIG
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- 51.57%
- YTD
- 526.74%
- 6M
- 438.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSIG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- —
NBIG vs. GSIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 526.74% | -59.80% |
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 0.68% | 0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIG and GSIG is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIG vs. GSIG — Risk / Return Rank
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GSIG
NBIG vs. GSIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG) and Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF (GSIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIG | GSIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIG vs. GSIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIG drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, which is greater than GSIG's maximum drawdown of -9.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIG and GSIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIG | GSIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -9.57% | -66.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | -0.31% | -7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -2.10% | -38.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility
NBIG vs. GSIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIG | GSIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.11% | 1.84% | +197.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.11% | 2.89% | +196.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.11% | 2.71% | +196.40% |
NBIG vs. GSIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIG's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIG vs. GSIG - Dividend Comparison
NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIG Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate 1-5 Year Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.61% | 4.59% | 3.51% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 0.45% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIG and GSIG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSIG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSIG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NBIG.
GSIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.
NBIG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GSIG is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NBIG and 0.14% for GSIG.
Find the right allocation for NBIG and GSIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer