NBIE vs. SPDW
NBIE (Neuberger International Core Equity ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. NBIE is actively managed, while SPDW is passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NBIE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.
Performance
NBIE vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIE
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDW
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
NBIE vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF | 4.75% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 9.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIE and SPDW is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIE vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank
NBIE
SPDW
NBIE vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger International Core Equity ETF (NBIE) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBIE | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.24 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
NBIE vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIE drawdown since its inception was -5.76%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIE and SPDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIE | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -60.02% | +54.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.87% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | -12.91% | +11.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility
NBIE vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIE | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.83% | 15.60% | +4.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 16.49% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 17.26% | +2.57% |
NBIE vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBIE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
NBIE vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
NBIE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIE Neuberger International Core Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.87% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, NBIE and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for NBIE.
SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.00% for NBIE.
They also come from different issuers: Neuberger and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NBIE and 0.04% for SPDW.
Find the right allocation for NBIE and SPDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer