PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBGNX vs. NML
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NBGNX vs. NML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NBGNX vs. NML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
0.95%-4.70%9.04%15.57%-19.49%18.07%24.86%29.47%-6.91%15.83%
NML
Neuberger Berman MLP
21.40%4.36%40.55%14.61%32.75%61.76%-45.84%10.60%-23.02%7.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBGNX achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than NML's 21.40% return. Over the past 10 years, NBGNX has underperformed NML with an annualized return of 8.79%, while NML has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


NBGNX

1D
2.44%
1M
-7.10%
YTD
0.95%
6M
-0.56%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
8.79%

NML

1D
-3.62%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
21.40%
6M
20.83%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
26.35%
5Y*
27.89%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBGNX vs. NML - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBGNX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than NML's 2.72% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NBGNX vs. NML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBGNX
NBGNX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NBGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

NML
NML Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NML Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
NML Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
NML Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NML Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBGNX vs. NML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NBGNXNMLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.24

0.88

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.51

1.22

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.19

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

1.39

-1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.67

4.74

-4.07

NBGNX vs. NML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBGNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the NML Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBGNX and NML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NBGNXNMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

0.88

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

1.17

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.35

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.07

+0.58

Correlation

The correlation between NBGNX and NML is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NBGNX vs. NML - Dividend Comparison

NBGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.20%, more than NML's 6.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGNX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund
16.20%16.36%2.15%3.03%11.05%10.92%3.84%5.82%12.24%13.89%11.21%18.52%
NML
Neuberger Berman MLP
6.92%8.24%7.94%10.19%4.26%3.54%8.33%9.76%9.87%7.04%8.63%15.44%

Drawdowns

NBGNX vs. NML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBGNX drawdown since its inception was -51.75%, smaller than the maximum NML drawdown of -90.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGNX and NML.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NBGNXNMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-90.48%

+38.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.26%

-15.67%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

-21.40%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.53%

-84.84%

+50.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.01%

-4.25%

-9.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-37.53%

+30.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

4.63%

-0.40%

Volatility

NBGNX vs. NML - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund (NBGNX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) have volatilities of 5.62% and 5.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NBGNXNMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

5.53%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

13.10%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.85%

22.10%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.68%

23.93%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

35.36%

-15.17%