PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NATO vs. BOTT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NATO vs. BOTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) and Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NATO vs. BOTT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
0.78%50.95%0.35%
BOTT
Themes Robotics & Automation ETF
7.81%55.56%-0.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NATO achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly lower than BOTT's 7.81% return.


NATO

1D
3.75%
1M
-11.24%
YTD
0.78%
6M
-1.05%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOTT

1D
4.19%
1M
-21.18%
YTD
7.81%
6M
15.56%
1Y
79.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NATO vs. BOTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NATO and BOTT have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

NATO vs. BOTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATO
NATO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTT
BOTT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BOTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATO vs. BOTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) and Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NATOBOTTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

2.13

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

2.72

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.58

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.09

9.13

-1.05

NATO vs. BOTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATO Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the BOTT Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATO and BOTT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NATOBOTTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

2.13

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.56

1.16

+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between NATO and BOTT is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NATO vs. BOTT - Dividend Comparison

NATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than BOTT's 0.13% yield.


TTM20252024
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
0.45%0.45%0.08%
BOTT
Themes Robotics & Automation ETF
0.13%0.14%1.74%

Drawdowns

NATO vs. BOTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATO drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, smaller than the maximum BOTT drawdown of -30.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATO and BOTT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NATOBOTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-30.74%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.99%

-30.74%

+14.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.83%

-27.84%

+15.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-5.77%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

8.69%

-4.43%

Volatility

NATO vs. BOTT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF (NATO) is 8.45%, while Themes Robotics & Automation ETF (BOTT) has a volatility of 13.08%. This indicates that NATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NATOBOTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

13.08%

-4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.04%

30.46%

-15.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.63%

37.62%

-14.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.75%

32.68%

-10.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

32.68%

-10.93%