NATKY vs. CCJ
NATKY (JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Uranium industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 3 years, NATKY returned 38.04%/yr vs 36.00%/yr for CCJ. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NATKY vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NATKY achieves a 29.22% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's -5.59% return.
NATKY
- 1D
- -6.83%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- 6M
- -16.58%
- YTD
- 29.22%
- 1Y
- 54.81%
- 3Y*
- 38.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 25.71%
CCJ
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -10.52%
- 6M
- -29.99%
- YTD
- -5.59%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 36.00%
- 5Y*
- 37.49%
- 10Y*
- 25.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $353.80M | $350.26M | $354.16M | |
| $6.71K | $7.57K | $33.06K |
NATKY vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NATKY JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom | 29.22% | 35.10% | -2.26% | 61.84% | -11.63% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | -5.59% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 90.49% | -21.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between NATKY and CCJ is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2022 | 0.16 |
The correlation between NATKY and CCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NATKY:
$16.43B
CCJ:
$37.62B
NATKY:
KZT 2.07K
CCJ:
CA$1.49
NATKY:
14.52
CCJ:
81.00
NATKY:
0.24
CCJ:
0.68
NATKY:
4.51
CCJ:
14.89
NATKY:
3.40
CCJ:
7.44
NATKY:
KZT 1.73T
CCJ:
CA$3.54B
NATKY:
KZT 822.28B
CCJ:
CA$1.04B
NATKY:
KZT 986.14B
CCJ:
CA$996.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NATKY vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
NATKY
CCJ
NATKY vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (NATKY) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NATKY | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.10 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 0.42 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | 0.98 | +3.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NATKY vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NATKY drawdown since its inception was -29.75%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATKY and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NATKY | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.75% | -87.53% | +57.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.75% | -36.93% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | -40.01% | +10.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.11% | -35.58% | +6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -46.00% | +36.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.70% | 15.91% | -2.21% |
Volatility
NATKY vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (NATKY) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ) have volatilities of 11.55% and 11.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NATKY | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.55% | 11.91% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.35% | 39.28% | -2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.36% | 55.93% | -5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.55% | 49.93% | -10.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.55% | 46.76% | -7.21% |
Dividends
NATKY vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
NATKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than CCJ's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
NATKY JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom | 4.15% | 0.00% | 7.27% | 4.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NATKY vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NATKY vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison
NATKY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom reported a gross profit of 45.57B and revenue of 146.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.
CCJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 291.00M and revenue of 847.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.3%.
NATKY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom reported an operating income of 31.69B and revenue of 146.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
CCJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 154.28M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.
NATKY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom reported a net income of -7.48B and revenue of 146.34B, resulting in a net margin of -5.1%.
CCJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 131.09M and revenue of 847.55M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NATKY and CCJ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCJ has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to NATKY (11.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NATKY dropped -29.75% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
NATKY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NATKY and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer