NATKY vs. CCJ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (NATKY) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).

Performance

NATKY vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (NATKY) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NATKY vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NATKY JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom	52.68%	35.10%	-2.26%	61.84%	-12.61%
CCJ Cameco Corporation	18.71%	78.38%	19.47%	90.49%	-20.62%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NATKY : $20.19B CCJ : $47.30B
EPS NATKY : $1.81K CCJ : $1.35
PE Ratio NATKY : 0.04 CCJ : 80.24
PEG Ratio NATKY : 0.00 CCJ : 0.67
PS Ratio NATKY : 0.02 CCJ : 13.59
PB Ratio NATKY : 5.09 CCJ : 6.86
Total Revenue (TTM) NATKY : $1.34T CCJ : $3.48B
Gross Profit (TTM) NATKY : $722.69B CCJ : $1.02B
EBITDA (TTM) NATKY : $829.21B CCJ : $1.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NATKY achieves a 52.68% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's 18.71% return.

NATKY

• 1D: -2.63%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 52.68%
• 6M: 46.25%
• 1Y: 139.58%
• 3Y*: 47.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCJ

• 1D: 5.61%
• 1M: -8.27%
• YTD: 18.71%
• 6M: 29.77%
• 1Y: 164.39%
• 3Y*: 61.02%
• 5Y*: 44.84%
• 10Y*: 25.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NATKY vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATKY

NATKY Risk / Return Rank: 96
NATKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
NATKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
NATKY Omega Ratio Rank: 98
NATKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NATKY Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CCJ

CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 95
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATKY vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (NATKY) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NATKY	CCJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	3.03	-0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	3.56	-0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.44	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.24	6.23	+1.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.10	16.57	+2.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NATKY vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATKY Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is comparable to the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATKY and CCJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NATKY	CCJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87	3.03	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.24	+0.66

Correlation

The correlation between NATKY and CCJ is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NATKY vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

NATKY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NATKY JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom	0.00%	0.00%	7.27%	4.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CCJ Cameco Corporation	0.16%	0.19%	0.22%	0.20%	0.39%	0.29%	0.46%	0.67%	0.53%	4.33%	3.82%	3.24%

Drawdowns

NATKY vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATKY drawdown since its inception was -29.45%, smaller than the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATKY and CCJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NATKY	CCJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.45%	-87.53%	+58.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.89%	-25.69%	+6.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.56%	-19.00%	+8.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-46.29%	+38.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.16%	9.67%	-2.51%

Volatility

NATKY vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom (NATKY) is 13.86%, while Cameco Corporation (CCJ) has a volatility of 17.51%. This indicates that NATKY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NATKY	CCJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.86%	17.51%	-3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.94%	41.70%	-2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.95%	54.64%	-5.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.63%	49.71%	-11.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.63%	46.28%	-7.65%

Financials

NATKY vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom and Cameco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NATKY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom reported a gross profit of 487.26M and revenue of 993.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

CCJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 266.88M and revenue of 1.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.

NATKY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom reported an operating income of 453.16M and revenue of 993.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.6%.

CCJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 163.55M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.

NATKY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, JSC National Atomic Company Kazatomprom reported a net income of 401.81M and revenue of 993.65M, resulting in a net margin of 40.4%.

CCJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 198.90M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.