NASA vs. GCAD
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and GCAD (Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NASA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for GCAD.
Performance
NASA vs. GCAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- -9.48%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCAD
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 15.34%
- 6M
- 19.90%
- 1Y
- 34.69%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NASA vs. GCAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 29.65% |
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and GCAD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. GCAD — Risk / Return Rank
NASA
GCAD
NASA vs. GCAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NASA | GCAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.20 | 1.58 | +3.62 |
Drawdowns
NASA vs. GCAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -22.08%, which is greater than GCAD's maximum drawdown of -16.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and GCAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | GCAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.08% | -16.14% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.08% | -4.89% | -17.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -3.03% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.34% | — |
Volatility
NASA vs. GCAD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | GCAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.27% | 19.42% | +41.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.27% | 18.54% | +42.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.27% | 18.54% | +42.73% |
NASA vs. GCAD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GCAD's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASA vs. GCAD - Dividend Comparison
NASA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF | 1.79% | 2.06% | 4.94% | 3.62% |
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NASA and GCAD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GCAD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GCAD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.
GCAD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for NASA.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.00% for GCAD.
Find the right allocation for NASA and GCAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer