PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NASA vs. CHPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NASA vs. CHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NASA

1D
1.72%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPX

1D
5.34%
1M
20.88%
YTD
94.77%
6M
99.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NASA vs. CHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NASA and CHPX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NASA vs. CHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NASA vs. CHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NASA vs. CHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, which is greater than CHPX's maximum drawdown of -15.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and CHPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NASACHPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-15.15%

-10.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.46%

-2.49%

-19.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-3.96%

-1.75%

Volatility

NASA vs. CHPX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NASACHPXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.70%

41.41%

+27.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.70%

41.41%

+27.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.70%

41.41%

+27.29%

NASA vs. CHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NASA vs. CHPX - Dividend Comparison

NASA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.


PositionTTM2025
CHPX
Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF
0.03%0.06%
NASA
Tema Space Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NASA and CHPX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.

CHPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for NASA.

NASA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while CHPX is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Tema and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.50% for CHPX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASA and CHPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer