PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NANC vs. TSPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NANC vs. TSPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than TSPY's 9.60% return.


NANC

1D
2.21%
1M
1.56%
6M
10.60%
YTD
11.53%
1Y
22.52%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.03%

TSPY

1D
1.41%
1M
1.70%
6M
7.09%
YTD
9.60%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$805.69K$811.59K$1.02M
$5.61M$5.02M$5.58M

NANC vs. TSPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NANC and TSPY is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2024

0.87

The correlation between NANC and TSPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NANC vs. TSPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NANC
NANC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

TSPY
TSPY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NANC vs. TSPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NANCTSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.28

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.30

9.56

-2.26

NANC vs. TSPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANC Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the TSPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANC and TSPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NANC vs. TSPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, which is greater than TSPY's maximum drawdown of -18.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and TSPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NANCTSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.94%

-18.02%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-9.63%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.63%

-2.46%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.30%

+0.79%

Volatility

NANC vs. TSPY - Volatility Comparison

Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) at 4.15%. This indicates that NANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NANCTSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

4.15%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

9.97%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

12.67%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

15.96%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.84%

15.96%

+0.88%

NANC vs. TSPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than TSPY's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

NANC vs. TSPY - Dividend Comparison

NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than TSPY's 13.82% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
0.19%0.21%0.20%0.94%
TSPY
TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF
13.82%13.69%3.45%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NANC and TSPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NANC has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to TSPY (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANC dropped -20.94% vs TSPY's -18.02%.

On 1-year performance, NANC leads with 22.52% vs 21.90% for TSPY. On fees, TSPY is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, TSPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NANC has performed better with a 22.52% return vs 21.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSPY is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for NANC.

TSPY has the higher dividend yield at 13.82%, compared with 0.19% for NANC.

NANC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TSPY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Tidal and TappAlpha. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for NANC and 0.68% for TSPY.

TSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NANC and TSPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer