PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSPY vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSPY vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSPY achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's 6.27% return.


TSPY

1D
0.53%
1M
0.29%
6M
6.27%
YTD
8.08%
1Y
20.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.62%

QDVO

1D
0.94%
1M
-1.24%
6M
6.01%
YTD
6.27%
1Y
15.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.21M$7.42M$8.70M
$5.19M$4.92M$5.63M

TSPY vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSPY
TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF
8.08%17.29%4.48%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
6.27%20.16%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TSPY and QDVO is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.82

The correlation between TSPY and QDVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSPY vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSPY
TSPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSPY vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSPYQDVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.41

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

4.98

+2.82

TSPY vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSPY and QDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSPY vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSPY drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVO drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPY and QDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSPYQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.02%

-17.75%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-10.21%

+0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-4.12%

+2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-2.46%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.88%

-0.58%

Volatility

TSPY vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) is 3.92%, while Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that TSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSPYQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

4.17%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

10.30%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

13.25%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.95%

17.39%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

17.39%

-1.44%

TSPY vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSPY has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSPY vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

TSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%, more than QDVO's 10.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
10.97%9.92%2.79%
TSPY
TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF
14.02%13.69%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSPY and QDVO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDVO has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to TSPY (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPY dropped -18.02% vs QDVO's -17.75%.

On 1-year performance, TSPY leads with 20.20% vs 15.95% for QDVO. On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, TSPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSPY has performed better with a 20.20% return vs 15.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for TSPY.

TSPY has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 10.97% for QDVO.

They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for TSPY and 0.56% for QDVO.

TSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSPY and QDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer