PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NANC vs. CRFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NANC vs. CRFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NANC vs. CRFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NANC
Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF
-6.68%18.54%26.83%20.79%
CRFIX
Calvert Focused Value Fund
-1.80%13.26%12.24%1.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a -6.68% return, which is significantly lower than CRFIX's -1.80% return.


NANC

1D
0.92%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
-6.68%
6M
-5.10%
1Y
18.06%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
10Y*

CRFIX

1D
2.65%
1M
-7.98%
YTD
-1.80%
6M
2.75%
1Y
11.90%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NANC vs. CRFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CRFIX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NANC vs. CRFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NANC
NANC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CRFIX
CRFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CRFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CRFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NANC vs. CRFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) and Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NANCCRFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.70

+0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

1.07

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.04

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.83

3.72

+2.11

NANC vs. CRFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANC Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the CRFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANC and CRFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NANCCRFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.70

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.50

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between NANC and CRFIX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NANC vs. CRFIX - Dividend Comparison

NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than CRFIX's 5.88% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
NANC
Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF
0.22%0.21%0.20%0.94%0.00%
CRFIX
Calvert Focused Value Fund
5.88%5.77%4.37%1.02%0.17%

Drawdowns

NANC vs. CRFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, which is greater than CRFIX's maximum drawdown of -18.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and CRFIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NANCCRFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.94%

-18.29%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-12.21%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.65%

-9.64%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-4.16%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.41%

-0.22%

Volatility

NANC vs. CRFIX - Volatility Comparison

Subversive Unusual Whales Democratic ETF (NANC) has a higher volatility of 5.91% compared to Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX) at 5.29%. This indicates that NANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NANCCRFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

5.29%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.72%

9.55%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.98%

16.79%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

15.74%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

15.74%

+1.12%