CRFIX vs. QDTE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE).

CRFIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Apr 28, 2022. QDTE is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Mar 6, 2024.

Performance

CRFIX vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRFIX vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRFIX Calvert Focused Value Fund	-1.80%	13.26%	7.48%
QDTE Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	-3.92%	19.32%	16.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRFIX achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly higher than QDTE's -3.92% return.

CRFIX

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: -7.98%
• YTD: -1.80%
• 6M: 2.75%
• 1Y: 11.90%
• 3Y*: 10.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDTE

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -4.27%
• YTD: -3.92%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: 21.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRFIX vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRFIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.95% expense ratio.

QDTE

Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

CRFIX

Calvert Focused Value Fund

Return for Risk

CRFIX vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRFIX

CRFIX Risk / Return Rank: 28
CRFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CRFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CRFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
CRFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
CRFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 58
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRFIX vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX) and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRFIX	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	1.09	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	1.46	-0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.22	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.04	1.56	-0.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	5.99	-2.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRFIX vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRFIX and QDTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRFIX	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	1.09	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.80	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between CRFIX and QDTE is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CRFIX vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

CRFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than QDTE's 51.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRFIX Calvert Focused Value Fund	5.88%	5.77%	4.37%	1.02%	0.17%
QDTE Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	51.17%	49.49%	32.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRFIX vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRFIX drawdown since its inception was -18.29%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRFIX and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRFIX	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.29%	-22.86%	+4.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.21%	-14.08%	+1.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.64%	-6.92%	-2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-3.30%	-0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	3.68%	-0.27%

Volatility

CRFIX vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Focused Value Fund (CRFIX) is 5.29%, while Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill N-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 5.86%. This indicates that CRFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRFIX	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.29%	5.86%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	12.11%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.79%	19.37%	-2.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.74%	18.71%	-2.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.74%	18.71%	-2.97%