NANC vs. BUFX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NANC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Subversive, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, NANC returned 20.46% vs 9.64% for BUFX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NANC charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.

Performance

NANC vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 3.81% return.

NANC

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 6.77%
• 1Y: 20.46%
• 3Y*: 22.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 3.81%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 9.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NANC vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	8.05%	11.46%
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF	3.81%	5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between NANC and BUFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.87

The correlation between NANC and BUFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NANC vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NANC

NANC Risk / Return Rank: 44
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 45
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 46

BUFX

BUFX Risk / Return Rank: 87
BUFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
BUFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
BUFX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
BUFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BUFX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NANC vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NANC	BUFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.40	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.79	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.53	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	3.38	-1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.77	19.91	-13.14

NANC vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NANC Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the BUFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NANC and BUFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NANC vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and BUFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NANC	BUFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.94%	-2.87%	-18.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.21%	-2.87%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-0.61%	-2.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-0.25%	-2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	0.49%	+2.54%

Volatility

NANC vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison

Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) at 1.22%. This indicates that NANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NANC	BUFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	1.22%	+4.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.50%	3.39%	+8.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.35%	4.03%	+10.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.86%	4.03%	+12.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	4.03%	+12.83%

NANC vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

NANC vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	0.19%	0.21%	0.20%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NANC and BUFX in my portfolio?

NANC and BUFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NANC or BUFX?

NANC has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to BUFX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NANC dropped -20.94% vs BUFX's -2.87%.

Which ETF is better, NANC or BUFX?

On 1-year performance, NANC leads with 20.46% vs 9.64% for BUFX. On fees, NANC is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, BUFX has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NANC or BUFX?

Over the 1-year period, NANC has performed better with a 20.46% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NANC or BUFX?

NANC is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NANC or BUFX?

NANC has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

What is the main difference between NANC and BUFX?

NANC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Subversive and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for NANC and 0.96% for BUFX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.