NANC vs. AFOS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

NANC (Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, NANC returned 20.46% vs 83.17% for AFOS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NANC charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.

Performance

NANC vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NANC achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 33.60% return.

NANC

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 6.77%
• 1Y: 20.46%
• 3Y*: 22.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFOS

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 33.60%
• 6M: 31.56%
• 1Y: 83.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NANC vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	8.05%	11.49%
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	33.60%	37.10%

Correlation

The correlation between NANC and AFOS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

NANC vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NANC

NANC Risk / Return Rank: 44
NANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
NANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
NANC Omega Ratio Rank: 45
NANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
NANC Martin Ratio Rank: 46

AFOS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NANC vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NANC	AFOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.77	—	—

Drawdowns

NANC vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NANC drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NANC and AFOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	NANC	AFOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.94%	-11.52%	-9.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.21%	-11.52%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-2.33%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-1.43%	-1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NANC	AFOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.35%	21.58%	-7.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.86%	21.58%	-4.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	21.58%	-4.72%

NANC vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NANC has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

NANC vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

NANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than AFOS's 0.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF	0.22%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%
NANC Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF	0.19%	0.21%	0.20%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NANC and AFOS in my portfolio?

NANC and AFOS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NANC or AFOS?

On 1-year performance, AFOS leads with 83.17% vs 20.46% for NANC. On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NANC or AFOS?

Over the 1-year period, AFOS has performed better with a 83.17% return vs 20.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NANC or AFOS?

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for NANC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NANC or AFOS?

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.19% for NANC.

What is the main difference between NANC and AFOS?

They also come from different issuers: Subversive and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for NANC and 0.45% for AFOS.