PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAEFX vs. GAAEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAEFX vs. GAAEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Alternatives Fund Investor Class (NAEFX) and Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAEFX achieves a 13.25% return, which is significantly higher than GAAEX's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, NAEFX has underperformed GAAEX with an annualized return of 9.35%, while GAAEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.


NAEFX

1D
2.45%
1M
-2.72%
6M
8.22%
YTD
13.25%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
9.35%
ALL TIME*
10.41%

GAAEX

1D
3.45%
1M
-2.82%
6M
2.23%
YTD
8.50%
1Y
20.21%
3Y*
2.79%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
9.84%
ALL TIME*
-2.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NAEFX vs. GAAEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAEFX
New Alternatives Fund Investor Class
13.25%27.81%-6.26%-2.74%-16.08%-5.02%61.33%36.68%-7.13%20.92%
GAAEX
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund
8.50%26.64%-11.85%-2.39%-12.67%8.40%86.45%30.20%-15.49%20.68%

Correlation

The correlation between NAEFX and GAAEX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.74

The correlation between NAEFX and GAAEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (10 years) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAEFX vs. GAAEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NAEFX
NAEFX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
NAEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NAEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GAAEX
GAAEX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GAAEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAAEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAAEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GAAEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAAEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NAEFX vs. GAAEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Alternatives Fund Investor Class (NAEFX) and Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAEFXGAAEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.15

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

1.18

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

3.45

+3.89

NAEFX vs. GAAEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAEFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the GAAEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAEFX and GAAEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAEFX vs. GAAEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAEFX drawdown since its inception was -42.74%, smaller than the maximum GAAEX drawdown of -85.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAEFX and GAAEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAEFXGAAEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.74%

-85.83%

+43.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-14.57%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.10%

-31.00%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.35%

-40.64%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.74%

-40.64%

-2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-53.71%

+48.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-63.55%

+50.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

4.99%

-2.35%

Volatility

NAEFX vs. GAAEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Alternatives Fund Investor Class (NAEFX) is 4.23%, while Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that NAEFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GAAEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAEFXGAAEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

6.67%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

17.65%

-4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.49%

21.55%

-6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.91%

22.77%

-4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

22.45%

-4.45%

NAEFX vs. GAAEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAEFX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than GAAEX's 1.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAEFX vs. GAAEX - Dividend Comparison

NAEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than GAAEX's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GAAEX
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund
0.30%0.33%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.28%0.00%
NAEFX
New Alternatives Fund Investor Class
0.82%0.93%1.75%4.14%4.37%4.90%4.88%5.35%6.39%3.98%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


NAEFX and GAAEX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAAEX has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to NAEFX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAEFX dropped -42.74% vs GAAEX's -85.83%.

NAEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAEFX and GAAEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer