GAAEX vs. ICHKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) and Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX).
GAAEX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Mar 30, 2006. ICHKX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Jun 29, 1994.
Performance
GAAEX vs. ICHKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GAAEX vs. ICHKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAAEX Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund | -3.94% | 26.64% | -11.85% | -2.39% | -12.67% | 8.40% | 86.45% | 30.20% | -15.49% | 20.68% |
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | -3.57% | 28.97% | 0.05% | -14.52% | -23.67% | -6.90% | 14.58% | 30.08% | -20.50% | 49.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAAEX achieves a -3.94% return, which is significantly lower than ICHKX's -3.57% return. Over the past 10 years, GAAEX has outperformed ICHKX with an annualized return of 8.24%, while ICHKX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.
GAAEX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -12.61%
- YTD
- -3.94%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- -1.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
ICHKX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -4.32%
- 1Y
- 12.70%
- 3Y*
- 1.13%
- 5Y*
- -6.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GAAEX vs. ICHKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAAEX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than ICHKX's 1.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GAAEX vs. ICHKX — Risk / Return Rank
GAAEX
ICHKX
GAAEX vs. ICHKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) and Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAAEX | ICHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 0.68 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 0.99 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.14 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 0.83 | +0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.26 | 3.51 | +2.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAAEX | ICHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 0.68 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | -0.27 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.18 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.19 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between GAAEX and ICHKX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GAAEX vs. ICHKX - Dividend Comparison
GAAEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than ICHKX's 1.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAAEX Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund | 0.34% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICHKX Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund | 1.10% | 1.06% | 1.11% | 0.74% | 0.86% | 20.44% | 3.57% | 4.37% | 12.53% | 6.76% | 5.31% | 12.25% |
Drawdowns
GAAEX vs. ICHKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAAEX drawdown since its inception was -85.83%, which is greater than ICHKX's maximum drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAAEX and ICHKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAAEX | ICHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.83% | -70.67% | -15.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.57% | -14.00% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.64% | -53.67% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.64% | -58.39% | +17.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.02% | -38.64% | -20.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.74% | -27.16% | -36.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 3.32% | +0.62% |
Volatility
GAAEX vs. ICHKX - Volatility Comparison
Guinness Atkinson Alternative Energy Fund (GAAEX) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Guinness Atkinson China And Hong Kong Fund (ICHKX) at 5.42%. This indicates that GAAEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICHKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GAAEX | ICHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 5.42% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.83% | 11.26% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.99% | 18.65% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 23.72% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 22.40% | -0.17% |