PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAEFX vs. NALFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NAEFX vs. NALFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Alternatives Fund Investor Class (NAEFX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NAEFX having a 13.25% return and NALFX slightly higher at 13.40%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NAEFX having a 9.35% annualized return and NALFX not far ahead at 9.61%.


NAEFX

1D
2.45%
1M
-2.72%
6M
8.22%
YTD
13.25%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
9.35%
ALL TIME*
10.41%

NALFX

1D
2.43%
1M
-2.70%
6M
8.34%
YTD
13.40%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
9.61%
ALL TIME*
7.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NAEFX vs. NALFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAEFX
New Alternatives Fund Investor Class
13.25%27.81%-6.26%-2.74%-16.08%-5.02%61.33%36.68%-7.13%20.92%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
13.40%28.13%-6.03%-2.49%-15.87%-4.78%61.74%36.98%-6.91%21.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NAEFX and NALFX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

1.00

The correlation between NAEFX and NALFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAEFX vs. NALFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NAEFX
NAEFX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
NAEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NAEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NALFX
NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NAEFX vs. NALFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Alternatives Fund Investor Class (NAEFX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAEFXNALFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.61

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

7.50

-0.16

NAEFX vs. NALFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAEFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the NALFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAEFX and NALFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAEFX vs. NALFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAEFX drawdown since its inception was -42.74%, smaller than the maximum NALFX drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAEFX and NALFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAEFXNALFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.74%

-59.67%

+16.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-7.53%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.10%

-18.99%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.35%

-38.03%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.74%

-42.35%

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-4.90%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-14.79%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.62%

+0.02%

Volatility

NAEFX vs. NALFX - Volatility Comparison

New Alternatives Fund Investor Class (NAEFX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) have volatilities of 4.23% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAEFXNALFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

4.22%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

12.85%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.49%

15.49%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.91%

17.90%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

17.99%

+0.01%

NAEFX vs. NALFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAEFX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than NALFX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

NAEFX vs. NALFX - Dividend Comparison

NAEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than NALFX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAEFX
New Alternatives Fund Investor Class
0.82%0.93%1.75%4.14%4.37%4.90%4.88%5.35%6.39%3.98%3.48%0.00%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
1.03%1.17%2.04%4.47%4.63%5.14%4.93%5.55%6.62%4.16%3.71%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, NAEFX and NALFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NAEFX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to NALFX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAEFX dropped -42.74% vs NALFX's -59.67%.

NALFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAEFX and NALFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer