NAEFX vs. PGINX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NAEFX (New Alternatives Fund Investor Class) and PGINX (Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - NAEFX is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by New Alternatives, while PGINX is a Global Equities fund managed by Pax World. Over the past 10 years, NAEFX returned 9.35%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for PGINX. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NAEFX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for PGINX.

Performance

NAEFX vs. PGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in New Alternatives Fund Investor Class (NAEFX) and Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class (PGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAEFX achieves a 13.25% return, which is significantly lower than PGINX's 15.27% return. Over the past 10 years, NAEFX has underperformed PGINX with an annualized return of 9.35%, while PGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.

NAEFX

• 1D: 2.45%
• 1M: -2.72%
• 6M: 8.22%
• YTD: 13.25%
• 1Y: 21.08%
• 3Y*: 8.93%
• 5Y*: 1.54%
• 10Y*: 9.35%
• ALL TIME*: 10.41%

PGINX

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -2.03%
• 6M: 11.40%
• YTD: 15.27%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 12.50%
• 5Y*: 5.60%
• 10Y*: 10.61%
• ALL TIME*: 7.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NAEFX New Alternatives Fund Investor Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PGINX Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

NAEFX vs. PGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NAEFX New Alternatives Fund Investor Class	13.25%	27.81%	-6.26%	-2.74%	-16.08%	-5.02%	61.33%	36.68%	-7.13%	20.92%
PGINX Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class	15.27%	14.14%	5.15%	16.85%	-22.39%	22.25%	26.00%	28.18%	-14.20%	26.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NAEFX and PGINX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.69

The correlation between NAEFX and PGINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NAEFX vs. PGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NAEFX

NAEFX Risk / Return Rank: 48
NAEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NAEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NAEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
NAEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NAEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

PGINX

PGINX Risk / Return Rank: 32
PGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
PGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
PGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
PGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
PGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NAEFX vs. PGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for New Alternatives Fund Investor Class (NAEFX) and Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class (PGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NAEFX	PGINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.99	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.46	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.18	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	1.48	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.34	5.01	+2.33

NAEFX vs. PGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAEFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the PGINX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAEFX and PGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NAEFX vs. PGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAEFX drawdown since its inception was -42.74%, smaller than the maximum PGINX drawdown of -52.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAEFX and PGINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAEFX	PGINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.74%	-52.48%	+9.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.54%	-11.49%	+3.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.10%	-19.57%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.35%	-33.54%	-4.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.74%	-33.54%	-9.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.95%	-4.78%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.28%	-9.51%	-3.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	3.39%	-0.75%

Volatility

NAEFX vs. PGINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for New Alternatives Fund Investor Class (NAEFX) is 4.23%, while Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class (PGINX) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that NAEFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAEFX	PGINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	4.85%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.85%	14.64%	-1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.49%	17.18%	-1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.91%	18.61%	-0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.00%	18.18%	-0.18%

NAEFX vs. PGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NAEFX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PGINX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

NAEFX vs. PGINX - Dividend Comparison

NAEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than PGINX's 20.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NAEFX New Alternatives Fund Investor Class	0.82%	0.93%	1.75%	4.14%	4.37%	4.90%	4.88%	5.35%	6.39%	3.98%	3.48%	0.00%
PGINX Impax Global Environmental Markets Fund Institutional Class	20.32%	23.71%	4.79%	0.74%	0.65%	2.10%	0.60%	0.86%	4.26%	3.44%	0.75%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAEFX and PGINX in my portfolio?

NAEFX and PGINX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAEFX or PGINX?

PGINX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to NAEFX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAEFX dropped -42.74% vs PGINX's -52.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.