NADQ.DE vs. VTTSX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and VTTSX (Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund) are both funds - NADQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while VTTSX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE returned 21.45%/yr vs 11.60%/yr for VTTSX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VTTSX.

Performance

NADQ.DE vs. VTTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

NADQ.DE is traded in EUR, while VTTSX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VTTSX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than VTTSX's 12.98% return. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE has outperformed VTTSX with an annualized return of 21.45%, while VTTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.60% annualized return.

NADQ.DE

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 20.63%
• 6M: 18.75%
• 1Y: 37.21%
• 3Y*: 24.74%
• 5Y*: 18.92%
• 10Y*: 21.45%

VTTSX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 3.22%
• YTD: 12.98%
• 6M: 12.55%
• 1Y: 25.80%
• 3Y*: 16.44%
• 5Y*: 11.13%
• 10Y*: 11.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NADQ.DE vs. VTTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist	20.63%	7.04%	34.07%	51.46%	-29.91%	39.75%	34.72%	43.03%	3.29%	15.73%
VTTSX Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund	12.98%	7.02%	22.18%	16.59%	-12.36%	25.16%	6.74%	29.03%	-4.49%	6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NADQ.DE and VTTSX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2012	0.59

The correlation between NADQ.DE and VTTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NADQ.DE vs. VTTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NADQ.DE

NADQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 72
NADQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NADQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NADQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
NADQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
NADQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

VTTSX

VTTSX Risk / Return Rank: 70
VTTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
VTTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VTTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VTTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VTTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NADQ.DE vs. VTTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NADQ.DE	VTTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.31	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.04	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.44	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	4.04	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.32	16.60	-5.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NADQ.DE vs. VTTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NADQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the VTTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NADQ.DE and VTTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NADQ.DE	VTTSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	2.31	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.84	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.11	0.77	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.81	+0.16

Drawdowns

NADQ.DE vs. VTTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, which is greater than VTTSX's maximum drawdown of -30.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and VTTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NADQ.DE	VTTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.44%	-30.84%	-2.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.97%	-6.28%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.70%	-18.56%	-8.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.16%	-18.56%	-12.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.16%	-30.84%	-0.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-0.27%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.93%	-3.90%	-2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	1.52%	+1.83%

Volatility

NADQ.DE vs. VTTSX - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX) at 2.60%. This indicates that NADQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NADQ.DE	VTTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	2.60%	+1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.95%	8.16%	+2.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.74%	11.00%	+4.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.84%	13.37%	+6.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.54%	15.15%	+4.39%

NADQ.DE vs. VTTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VTTSX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NADQ.DE vs. VTTSX - Dividend Comparison

NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VTTSX's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist	0.33%	0.40%	0.55%	0.40%	0.79%	0.51%	0.40%	0.54%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTTSX Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund	1.84%	2.06%	2.20%	2.14%	2.09%	5.67%	1.83%	2.11%	2.33%	1.77%	1.98%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NADQ.DE and VTTSX in my portfolio?

NADQ.DE and VTTSX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.