NADQ.DE vs. MWOW.DE
NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and MWOW.DE (Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - NADQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while MWOW.DE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NADQ.DE returned 37.21% vs 22.18% for MWOW.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for MWOW.DE.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than MWOW.DE's 7.34% return.
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 37.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
MWOW.DE
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 6M
- 6.25%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NADQ.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 7.04% | 12.01% |
MWOW.DE Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating | 7.34% | 4.92% | 13.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and MWOW.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between NADQ.DE and MWOW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADQ.DE vs. MWOW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NADQ.DE
MWOW.DE
NADQ.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWOW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NADQ.DE | MWOW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.26 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 1.56 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 4.43 | +6.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NADQ.DE | MWOW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.48 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.81 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, which is greater than MWOW.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and MWOW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADQ.DE | MWOW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -27.10% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -14.64% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -1.48% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -6.07% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 5.18% | -1.83% |
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWOW.DE) at 3.71%. This indicates that NADQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADQ.DE | MWOW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 3.71% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 10.29% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 15.41% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 20.20% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 20.20% | -0.66% |
NADQ.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOW.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. MWOW.DE - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while MWOW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWOW.DE Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, NADQ.DE and MWOW.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MWOW.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWOW.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for NADQ.DE.
NADQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MWOW.DE is Large Cap Growth Equities. NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while MWOW.DE tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for NADQ.DE and 0.19% for MWOW.DE.
Find the right allocation for NADQ.DE and MWOW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer