PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAD vs. PDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NAD vs. PDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAD achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than PDO's -1.72% return.


NAD

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.28%
YTD
2.38%
6M
2.47%
1Y
13.47%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
2.83%

PDO

1D
0.78%
1M
1.23%
YTD
-1.72%
6M
-1.43%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAD vs. PDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
2.38%11.29%8.74%1.26%-22.85%10.42%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
-1.72%13.96%24.55%8.06%-23.40%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NAD and PDO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.32

The correlation between NAD and PDO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAD vs. PDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAD
NAD Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAD Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAD Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PDO
PDO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAD vs. PDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NADPDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.16

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.66

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

2.29

+4.29

NAD vs. PDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the PDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAD and PDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAD vs. PDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAD drawdown since its inception was -44.65%, which is greater than PDO's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAD and PDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NADPDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.65%

-36.83%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-11.18%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.69%

-16.55%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.58%

-36.83%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-5.54%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-14.37%

+6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.20%

-1.14%

Volatility

NAD vs. PDO - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NADPDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

3.68%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

9.06%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

10.08%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.63%

15.80%

-4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.93%

15.54%

-3.61%

Dividends

NAD vs. PDO - Dividend Comparison

NAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%, less than PDO's 11.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.21%7.37%6.63%4.13%5.58%4.43%4.41%4.40%5.37%5.42%6.05%5.96%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
11.94%11.09%11.29%12.54%19.09%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NAD vs. PDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
148.14M
(NAD) Total Revenue
(PDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NAD and PDO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDO has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to NAD (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAD dropped -44.65% vs PDO's -36.83%.

NAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAD and PDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer