MZZ vs. TERG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MZZ (ProShares UltraShort MidCap400) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MZZ is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.68, they often move in opposite directions. MZZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.

Performance

MZZ vs. TERG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MZZ achieves a -22.57% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 203.84% return.

MZZ

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -5.89%
• YTD: -22.57%
• 6M: -23.66%
• 1Y: -35.66%
• 3Y*: -23.59%
• 5Y*: -16.74%
• 10Y*: -25.27%

TERG

• 1D: 12.62%
• 1M: 23.07%
• YTD: 203.84%
• 6M: 206.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MZZ vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400	-22.57%	-9.36%
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF	203.84%	28.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MZZ and TERG is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	-0.68

Return for Risk

MZZ vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MZZ

MZZ Risk / Return Rank: 1
MZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MZZ vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MZZ	TERG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.15	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.65	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.73	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MZZ	TERG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.60	8.56	-9.16

Drawdowns

MZZ vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MZZ drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZZ and TERG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MZZ	TERG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.90%	-49.52%	-50.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.90%	-22.55%	-77.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.07%	-13.71%	-72.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.39%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MZZ	TERG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.15%	139.43%	-108.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.16%	139.43%	-100.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.39%	139.43%	-98.04%

MZZ vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MZZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MZZ vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison

MZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400	6.70%	5.27%	6.36%	4.52%	0.25%	0.00%	0.22%	1.53%	0.53%
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MZZ and TERG in my portfolio?

MZZ and TERG have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MZZ or TERG?

On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MZZ or TERG?

TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MZZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MZZ or TERG?

MZZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.

What is the main difference between MZZ and TERG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MZZ and 0.75% for TERG.