MZZ vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MZZ (ProShares UltraShort MidCap400) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MZZ is passively managed, while MULL is actively managed. Over the past year, MZZ returned -35.66% vs 6388.53% for MULL. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. MZZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

MZZ vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MZZ achieves a -22.57% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 907.48% return.

MZZ

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -5.89%
• YTD: -22.57%
• 6M: -23.66%
• 1Y: -35.66%
• 3Y*: -23.59%
• 5Y*: -16.74%
• 10Y*: -25.27%

MULL

• 1D: 5.57%
• 1M: 246.94%
• YTD: 907.48%
• 6M: 1,268.17%
• 1Y: 6,388.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MZZ vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400	-22.57%	-14.68%	11.38%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	907.48%	558.51%	-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MZZ and MULL is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	-0.46

The correlation between MZZ and MULL shifts across timeframes, from -0.46 (all time) to -0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MZZ vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MZZ

MZZ Risk / Return Rank: 1
MZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
MZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MZZ vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MZZ	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.15	49.08	-50.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.65	7.09	-8.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.90	-1.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	130.56	-131.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.73	439.01	-440.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MZZ vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MZZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 49.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MZZ and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MZZ	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.15	49.08	-50.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.60	7.34	-7.94

Drawdowns

MZZ vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MZZ drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZZ and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MZZ	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.90%	-72.29%	-27.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.22%	-53.09%	+17.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.90%	0.00%	-99.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.07%	-20.67%	-65.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.39%	15.79%	+4.60%

Volatility

MZZ vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) is 8.88%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.71%. This indicates that MZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MZZ	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.88%	55.71%	-46.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.99%	105.59%	-82.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.15%	132.53%	-101.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.16%	136.39%	-97.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.39%	136.39%	-95.00%

MZZ vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MZZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MZZ vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

MZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400	6.70%	5.27%	6.36%	4.52%	0.25%	0.00%	0.22%	1.53%	0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MZZ and MULL in my portfolio?

MZZ and MULL have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MZZ or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.71%) compared to MZZ (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MZZ dropped -99.90% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, MZZ or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6388.53% vs -35.66% for MZZ. On fees, MZZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MZZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MZZ or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6388.53% return vs -35.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MZZ or MULL?

MZZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MZZ or MULL?

MZZ has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between MZZ and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MZZ and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (49.08 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.