MZZ vs. UPRO

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

MZZ (ProShares UltraShort MidCap400) and UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - MZZ tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (-200%) while UPRO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MZZ returned -24.79%/yr vs 29.10%/yr for UPRO. At a correlation of -0.86, they often move in opposite directions. MZZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for UPRO.

Performance

MZZ vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MZZ achieves a -23.87% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 26.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MZZ has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of -24.79%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 29.10% annualized return.

MZZ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.80%
• 6M: -16.61%
• YTD: -23.87%
• 1Y: -29.15%
• 3Y*: -20.89%
• 5Y*: -16.96%
• 10Y*: -24.79%

UPRO

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: 5.07%
• 6M: 20.68%
• YTD: 26.83%
• 1Y: 57.69%
• 3Y*: 47.32%
• 5Y*: 20.56%
• 10Y*: 29.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MZZ vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400	-23.87%	-14.68%	-17.75%	-23.67%	13.02%	-42.14%	-53.08%	-38.03%	22.83%	-27.72%
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500	26.83%	31.88%	63.57%	68.53%	-56.84%	98.64%	10.09%	102.30%	-25.11%	71.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MZZ and UPRO is -0.76, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009	-0.86

The correlation between MZZ and UPRO shifts across timeframes, from -0.86 (all time) to -0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MZZ vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MZZ

MZZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
MZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

UPRO

UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 53
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MZZ vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MZZ	UPRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.88	1.50	-2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.16	1.99	-3.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.26	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	2.10	-2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	8.29	-9.76

MZZ vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MZZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MZZ and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MZZ vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MZZ drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than UPRO's maximum drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZZ and UPRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MZZ	UPRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.90%	-76.82%	-23.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.02%	-26.78%	-8.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.13%	-48.87%	-15.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.29%	-63.94%	-6.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.79%	-76.82%	-17.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.90%	-2.91%	-96.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.13%	-14.37%	-71.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.96%	6.76%	+12.20%

Volatility

MZZ vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) is 9.27%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 13.43%. This indicates that MZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MZZ	UPRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.27%	13.43%	-4.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.59%	29.89%	-6.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.72%	37.50%	-5.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.15%	50.65%	-11.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.23%	53.70%	-12.47%

MZZ vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MZZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

MZZ vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

MZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than UPRO's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400	5.67%	5.27%	6.36%	4.52%	0.25%	0.00%	0.22%	1.53%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500	0.74%	0.84%	0.93%	0.74%	0.52%	0.06%	0.11%	0.41%	0.63%	0.00%	0.12%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MZZ and UPRO in my portfolio?

MZZ and UPRO have a correlation of -0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MZZ or UPRO?

UPRO has higher volatility (13.43%) compared to MZZ (9.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MZZ dropped -99.90% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

Which ETF is better, MZZ or UPRO?

On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 29.10% vs -24.79% for MZZ. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, MZZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MZZ or UPRO?

Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 29.10% return vs -24.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MZZ or UPRO?

UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MZZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MZZ or UPRO?

MZZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.67%, compared with 0.74% for UPRO.

What is the main difference between MZZ and UPRO?

MZZ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (-200%), while UPRO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MZZ and 0.89% for UPRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.