MZZ vs. LINT
MZZ (ProShares UltraShort MidCap400) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MZZ is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. MZZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
MZZ vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MZZ achieves a -23.87% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 464.60% return.
MZZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- -16.61%
- YTD
- -23.87%
- 1Y
- -29.15%
- 3Y*
- -20.89%
- 5Y*
- -16.96%
- 10Y*
- -24.79%
LINT
- 1D
- -4.85%
- 1M
- -27.23%
- 6M
- 279.62%
- YTD
- 464.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MZZ vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 | -23.87% | -8.62% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 464.60% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between MZZ and LINT is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MZZ vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
MZZ
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MZZ vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MZZ | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MZZ vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MZZ drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZZ and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MZZ | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.90% | -49.54% | -50.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -41.77% | -58.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.13% | -20.81% | -65.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.96% | — | — |
Volatility
MZZ vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MZZ | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.59% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.72% | 168.20% | -136.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.15% | 168.20% | -129.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.23% | 168.20% | -126.97% |
MZZ vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MZZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
MZZ vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
MZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than LINT's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 | 5.67% | 5.27% | 6.36% | 4.52% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 1.53% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MZZ and LINT have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MZZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MZZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
MZZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.67%, compared with 0.48% for LINT.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MZZ and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for MZZ and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer