MYY vs. JHMM
MYY (ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400) and JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MYY is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 (-100%), while JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MYY returned -11.12%/yr vs 11.88%/yr for JHMM. At a correlation of -0.96, they often move in opposite directions. MYY charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JHMM.
Performance
MYY vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYY achieves a -11.13% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, MYY has underperformed JHMM with an annualized return of -11.12%, while JHMM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.88% annualized return.
MYY
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- YTD
- -11.13%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- -16.67%
- 3Y*
- -9.90%
- 5Y*
- -5.92%
- 10Y*
- -11.12%
JHMM
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
MYY vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYY ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 | -11.13% | -4.05% | -7.08% | -9.46% | 10.23% | -23.04% | -25.94% | -19.98% | 12.79% | -14.63% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 12.60% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 30.01% | -9.57% | 19.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYY and JHMM is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015 | -0.96 |
The correlation between MYY and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYY vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank
MYY
JHMM
MYY vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 (MYY) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MYY | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | 1.77 | -2.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | 2.55 | -4.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.31 | -0.48 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 2.89 | -3.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | 11.17 | -12.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MYY | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.08 | 1.77 | -2.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | 0.46 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.52 | 0.61 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | 0.63 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
MYY vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYY drawdown since its inception was -95.08%, which is greater than JHMM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYY and JHMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYY | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.08% | -40.71% | -54.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.58% | -8.64% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.48% | -21.88% | -11.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.20% | -24.10% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.22% | -40.71% | -30.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.07% | -0.24% | -94.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.15% | -5.43% | -66.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.56% | 2.23% | +7.33% |
Volatility
MYY vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 (MYY) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 3.81%. This indicates that MYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYY | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 3.81% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 10.47% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 14.12% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 18.32% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 19.60% | +1.65% |
MYY vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
MYY vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison
MYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than JHMM's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
MYY ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 | 4.45% | 4.20% | 4.92% | 5.08% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.52% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYY and JHMM have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MYY has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to JHMM (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYY dropped -95.08% vs JHMM's -40.71%.
On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 11.88% vs -11.12% for MYY. On fees, JHMM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 11.88% return vs -11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHMM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MYY.
MYY has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.
MYY is categorized as Inverse Equities, while JHMM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. MYY tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 (-100%), while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MYY and 0.42% for JHMM.
JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MYY and JHMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer